Is This a Blunder?

Sort:
IHaveTheSauce
ChessMasterGS wrote:
Max_Wolfe wrote:
ChessMasterGS wrote:

So all of you are saying that I'm screwed either way? Really really really helpful, everyone.

Lol who said that? In your position you can risk the long diagonal bishop trade or delay the trade and play the pawn to block and trade knights with Blue instead  

"Red didn't make any blunders, if anything it's you who made a blunder."

"It's probably better to push the bishop pawn, even if it may let blue fork you."

well you're not screwed in this position, you just have to be VERY VERY careful, and it will be VERY unpleasant. It's blue's turn and blue will undoubtedly play 2. Bb7. You cannot play Nf6 because after green plays for example 2. Kg3, red and blue will play 3. Ba3 Bc6+ you are dead. Ne7 doesn't lead to any checkmate but your bishop will probably never see the light of day. f6 is the best try, but again, you are probably not going to be able to trade your bishop, and you will get destroyed if blue pawn storms you.

1Username2awesome3

if both  yellow and red are idiots (im talking to you kc), green is actually mated

 

oatey

Where is the fork threat from Blue if Yellow plays bishop pawn instead of King?

TheUltraTrap

i know that, but i think he is asking about RY setup (probably even if blue didnt blunder mate).

Also That isn't technically a blunder - It's a missed win.

TheUltraTrap

ik its practically the same as a blunder its just a different way of blunder with its own name

IHaveTheSauce

In hyper isn't that trap something you generally aren't "supposed" to do (at least on the 4pc server)?

TheUltraTrap

why would you not be supposed to win??? I agree with vepos, it makes no sense