Issue ✔: Archive Accuracy display order confusing

When looking at an archive entry the players can be listed

White's name
Black's name

or

Black's name
White's name

But the accuracy numbers are always

White's accuracy
Bkack's accuracy

so an entry can be

Black's Name                     1/2                         White's Accuracy
White's Name                     1/2                          Black's accuracy

This is confusing. Better would be

Black's Name                     1/2                         Black's Accuracy
White's Name                     1/2                          White's Accuracy

Note the bottom name is always the achive owners so the bottom accuracy should be as well.

I reported this issue as well, but there was a discrepancy in the numbers as well.

Black should always be on the bottom.

Yes I thought I had only black for a minute. Black should always be on bottom and the accuracy and score currently is not correct:

Thanks! I ticketed this yesterday

Hey guys, thanks for reporting this, it should be fixed as of yesterday.

Hi, 

No still wrong display here.

The accuracy position has been fixed and is matched to the players so the archive owner's accuracy is listed on the bottom.

There are still small value differences between archive and report, For example the archive lists  94.1 & 92.4  versus the analysis report lists 94.2 92.5. 

The Accuracy is correct, but still my name is at the bottom regardless if I have White Or Black. Also the score is wrong, it shows an 0 if i have won the game.

https://www.chess.com/games/archive

I have won with white:

- My name is at the bottom
- The score after my name says 0
- The green + sign and accurracy are correct here.

I think White should always be named first so it should be like this:

Sorry for the inconvenience, it will be ready/fixed on Monday.  

I checked, it is correct now, thanks!

Thanks for verifying