Lets talk about the big bang.

I said "phtphtpht" because Elroch was being a snob and being condescending 

There's nothing in scripture that describes the Earth (or Universe) as being several thousand years old. I think it was Bishop Usher(?) who calculated the period elapsed since the Biblical creation by adding together the life-spans of all the prophets mentioned in the Old Testament.

About as useful as me counting all the hairs on my chin & claiming it signifies something.

If you make claims that are demonstrably false, people are not being condescending if they point out your error.

Ok, let me put it another way. What is your reasoning that an asteroid that would change the direction of rotation of a planet would "destroy the planet"? (Presumably the latter means smash it into pieces?

If this doesn't involve any calculations or amy source which you can refer to which clearly implies the conclusion, observe that you have made a guess about an event which is extremely far from that on which you intuition is based.

Do you see why such a guess is unreliable?

 my guess makes scene to me. im scared to post something. its not like i run to the web every time i say something 

and still, your astroid theory does not explain hwy galaxys spin backward 

It's not necessary to explain every unusual phenomenon that we observe to be extremely confident that it has a naturalistic cause. Jumping to fantastic explanations for things should always be resisted until all simpler, physical ones have been exhausted.

And how could galaxies spinning in various directions, be used to disprove Big Bang?

Because of inershaa

trump, it would be easier to take your objections seriously if you could at least spell them properly?

I'm assuming you mean 'inertia'? What about it regarding the spin of galaxies?

Be cool, Stephen😎. This is not gramm are class

Cool? I'm positively cold when it comes to backing up propositional claims with actual evidence & sound argument.

So again, what does inertia have to do with the spin of any galaxy & in what way might it throw doubt on our current theories regarding the origin of our Universe?

Here are two contradicting videos about the Big Bang, both rom the same source.

(So something for everybody.)

The BBT says all the matter in the universe was condensed into a tiny spec and that spec spun super fast and then exploded and all the galaxies and moon and planet ect spun off. So obviously the planets and galaxies should be spinning the same direction because of inershaa. Spelled that wrong on purpose this time haha

Even if the Big Bang had been an actual explosion, things would spin in all directions.

Are you making that up? If not, do you have a source? This Wiki article lays out the broad principles of the Big Bang theory & there's no mention of spin! (searches for spin or spun yield nothing)...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

Are you giving the theory a creationist 'spin'?

From my end, i don't see the Big Bang in the bible. Some say 'Let there be light' ( G c1v3) is the Big Bang.

But, simply enough, with any explosion you get more chaos than the order we see in our known universe... 

That's because it wasn't an 'explosion' in any sense of the term we understand. It was an expansion driven by something Cosmologists call 'inflation'. I don't pretend to have a perfect understanding myself.

But the Bible doesn't contain all manner of factual matters that we now know to be the case. For example, there's no mention of Earth & all the other planets orbiting the Sun. No mention of galaxies etc..

No, I never make things up. When hovind explained it he said that's what you guys believe 

In the end, no one really knows what happened at the beginning of time for certain. There will never be any way to be completely sure. And that doesn’t bother me at all. I like mystery.