Math Questions and Answers

Sort:
Avatar of SciFiChess

Use this forum to post questions about math problems. This can include general questions about pure mathematics and applied mathematics. Club members are invited to post solutions or answers to your questions.

If you have questions or comments about how we run the Math and Chess Club, use the following link.

You can also create a new forum topic for the Math and Chess Club or chess.com.

Avatar of AhmedAryan

joined the club for the sole purpose of one question

need some checking on this formula

Avatar of mercatorproject
AhmedAryan wrote:

joined the club for the sole purpose of one question

need some checking on this formula

Mercator asks Ahmed:

Please tell us where you came across this formula, and what it means.

Avatar of travis37732

Hey everyone, this is off-topic for math, but curious if anyone's tried those online <a href="https://realiqtestonline.com/">IQ brain tests</a>? Are they accurate at all?

Avatar of mercatorproject
travis37732 wrote:

Hey everyone, this is off-topic for math, but curious if anyone's tried those online IQ brain tests? Are they accurate at all?

A rough estimate in some cases.

Avatar of MF972
AhmedAryan wrote:

joined the club for the sole purpose of one question

need some checking on this formula

If your "arrow squared" (↑²) notation is supposed to mean the double arrow notation,  ↑↑, 
then I wonder,

a) why don't you use the usual ↑↑ notation? (obviously to be able to say "no, I didn't mean that"...)
(Note, it's a very common and strong (and commonly strongly agreed upon) crackpot flag to use nonstandard notation. *Absolutely* to be avoided if you want that people look at what you write.)

b) what it can mean for non-integer x, because it is usually defined as "iterate exponentiation x-1 times, e.g., 2 ↑↑ 4 = 2^(2^(2^2)). I don't see how we can (unambiguously) define that for a non-integer x. (Edit: I have thought a while... I found an idea how to define a↑↑(b+x) for 0 <= x <= 1, namely, you take  a↑↑(b+1) but replace the last a on top of the tower by a^x -- then for x=0 this gives 1, as if nothing was there in the exponent, and therefore a↑↑b, as required ; for x=1 it is there, as expected for a↑↑(b+1). I wonder whether this is the non-integer generalization you found somewhere - and if so, where?)

Obviously, we have first to define the generalisation to non-integer x's, before we can apply usual differentiation d/dx. Otherwise one could also look, e.g., at finite differences.

Avatar of MF972
AhmedAryan wrote:

joined the club for the sole purpose of one question

need some checking on this formula

Actually : what is "n", appearing on the RHS but not on the LHS? 🤔

Avatar of MF972
mercatorproject wrote:
travis37732 wrote:

Hey everyone, this is off-topic for math, but curious if anyone's tried those online IQ brain tests? Are they accurate at all?

A rough estimate in some cases.

I agree. For more on this topic, please use our "IQ-Forum" (click here), let's limit the discussion here to topics around the double-arrow notation. - Thanks!