Mathematical challenges to Darwin's Theory of evolution

Whether or not he did (knowing Elroch I think he probably did) doesn't detract from the question - are you able to explain what you see as the mathematical challenge in your own words?

Yes, I watched the whole thing and have repeatedly noted that the title of the video "Mathematical Challenges to Darwin's Theory of Evolution" is misleading because no actual mathematical challenges were presented.  The video offers *qualitative* analogies to computer code and programming and such, and makes *qualitative* assertions about the improbability of originating functional proteins from scratch (which is more a problem for the origin of life and not Darwin's theory of evolution), but does not present any actual *quantitative* number-based "mathematical challenges" to Darwin's theory of evolution.  Call me crazy, but I expect putative "mathematical challenges" to include some actual math.

I don't know what to say to you since actual math was referred to, and you managed to miss it several times over. If the computer analogies are not related to mathematical improbabilities either, I don't think I can enlighten you on the issues expressed any more than they attempted to do.

Math involves actual numbers, not just saying numbers are involved without presenting any.  We've already been over this and I'm not interested in doing it again unless you can present actual MATHEMATICAL CHALLENGES with actual NUMBERS.  Seriously, stop claiming there's "actual math" in the video while refusing to tell us where it is and what the actual math is.  No one's interested in hunting for truffles.  I watched the video and saw no number based mathematical challenges to Darwin's theory of evolution.  If I'm wrong and missed it, then simply provide the time stamp location in the video where we can find it.  But no more of this "it's-in-there-but-you-have-to-hunt-and-find-it-yourself" games like you did last time.

I don't think so, I've pointed you to places to look earlier it didn't matter, you watching a few times I too I guess didn't matter. 

You have NEVER given a time stamp location in the video, so again unless you can do so your claim remains bogus as usual and nothing more than empty talk.

Let's have that timestamp, @TruthMuse. Any example will do. The argument that it's in there somewhere but you are incapable of identifying where doesn't suffice.

Well, I have given timestamps in this thread before #30. If you are not going to watch the full thing, why bother discussing this? If all you want to do is pick apart my opinion about it look at all the things I have already said. It is becoming evident to me that is what is going on here, nothing more.

If you go back a little earlier than the one I have given, they speak to numbers too, of course, had you watch this instead of asking about, you'd known that. Without insisting, I limit you're exposed to it by cherry-picking the parts you have to watch.

TM, the simple fact is that most people in these forums don't post hour long videos much less without providing a synopsis, much less without directing people to what they consider the most important parts much less insist that people view such a video in its entirety.  Supporting your view with links to peer reviewed professional articles would be better.