so i guess were both right and wrong
No, "?!" is inaccuracy/dubious, and "!?" is interesting. Lol when I was a beginner I thought they were the same until I learned the difference
so i guess were both right and wrong
No, "?!" is inaccuracy/dubious, and "!?" is interesting. Lol when I was a beginner I thought they were the same until I learned the difference
yeah for some of them yes but not for the Bad book moves, aggressive moves, Unexpected brilliant move, (that is why they are called that!) and good book moves
true, not all of ghem ofc. is there even such a thing as bad book move? also blunder is a worst move alr. And sometimes agressive move can be a good move or excellent or best etc.
i mean the bongcloud and wrongcloud exist
I like most of them but I don't like as much these ones:
Worst move (I don't think this should be added because in my opinion it is kind of useless for review and only a novelty)
Unexpected Brilliant move (nothing is exactly "unexpected" to an engine and that is what you are using for review)
Unexpected move (same as above)
(I will just note that there are a few positions that an engine may take a few seconds to a minute to find the correct move and you may call that "unexpected" but it would be so rare that there would be no point for game review although all of these would be useful for analysis)
Good book move (seems pointless)
Ones that I love:
Risky move (I think this was in chess.com at some point (and may actually still be there in analysis)
Aggressive move (I do think that this could basically be the same as risky move but just for attacking ideas but I like the idea)
Bad book move (Currently openings such as stafford gambit (which are objectively bad but sometimes played by masters (Eric Rosen)) are marked as a "miss" but this would be a good one for replacing the "miss")
All of these are just my opinion so no need to hate on me ![]()
Probably there should Best Book Move (moves which is by theory proven the best), Bad Book Move (a move which is by theory bad) and OK Book Move (a book which is considered OK but not the best nor bad)
yo guys u should put ur icon ideas and i will try to make it for u guys and hopefully it might get added into chess.com
Blunder if they see it, brilliant if they don't XD Honestly that happens so much that I wouldn't be surprised if they added that
the innacuracy can also be called interesting move
Nope! That never happens.