My Games 1 - Queen Sac Possibilities!

Sort:
Avatar of GM_Dude_Chess

Today I am posting my first game to Rasberry Chess. I hope to make a habit of this because I learn so much by doing so. However, forums like this one take a couple of hours and I don’t have that much time lying around every day, so these will come out sparsely. Here is a great method to get the most of my and other’s games presented here on chess.com:

 

1.      Play through the game once quickly – don’t stop to look at variations.

2.      Decide if the game is worth your time. - Maybe you are just so good, that a game that would be educational to a 1400 would be of no use to you.

3.      If it is worth your time, SET TIME APART to look at the game – Learning from these forums will take time, but this is how you will improve! If you don’t have 15-30 mins, then all you will be doing is looking at the game for visual pleasure and not be learning anything.

4.      If you have the time, then start by going through just the main line getting a feeling for what moves you like and didn’t like – don’t go through the annotations or variation.

5.      Next Play through each variation as you come to it, reading the analysis as provided - Do this slowly and try to guess my move, my opponent’s move, or the computer’s move.

6.      Finally, go back through the game just as you did in step four –Compare your feelings to the computer analysis and my annotations!

           This first game is very rich, surprisingly rich! Take note of the pawn structure decisions I make and learn from my mistakes. Also, study all the possible attacks I had, the crazy piece sacrifices and, of course, the queen sac! Enjoy! 

 



What did I learn from that game and what can you?

1.      Understand that every move has advantages and drawbacks and I need to evaluate the moves better. a4 had a drawback of weakening the b4 square, but that was a non-useful square for black; I could afford to give up that square to gain space and cramp up black’s activity.

2.      Learn about the pawn structure I presented. The a3-b4 pawns against the a6-b5 pawns were instructive. That pawn structure requires attention!

3.      Add the queen sac and the other piece sacs to my and your repertoires. Those attacks are crazy, but they come about every so often.

4.      Never give in. Just a couple of tournaments ago, I basically resigned in a drawn position, I just gave up looking for a simple solution like Chris did here in the game. His time was low, but he had enough time to realize his king was not in that much danger, enough danger to play Qa7 to defend that way at least!

My favorite thing on chess.com is the comment section! I just love it. Use it, if you do I know my I am spending my time well. If you don’t, I have to guess my time is going to waste. SO, let me know what you think!

Chessicaly,

Jonathan Rasberry


Avatar of Faarian

Hi again!

I just read all the material you provided here, your thoughts, the game moves, variations and so on and so forth. I think you've done a great work:)

I particularly enjoyed your comments on the opening part, which I think, in comparison with other parts, I need more knowledge and general thoughts like the one you provided here. Thanks for that. I'd like to read and discuss this part of the game much. 

And I guess you are so strong in this part of the game, because in our game, you got a good advantage out of the opening:) Maybe, like me, you had better work more on how you could win a winning position (just a suggestion, you're a titled player and I'm not:))

Avatar of Faarian

But about the commentary and encouraging people here to participate more, I think it's really a hard task. Much material on chess is available everywhere, including on Chess.com, so you have a hard task. I hope you get what you want and deserve:)

Avatar of GM_Dude_Chess

To your first comment: Actually, openings are one of my weakest areas! At least as far as theory is concerend. I have been coached by an IM, and he said if I could learn the opening better, then with the rest of my game, I might soon make master (note I was the first to falter in the game above and wished not to challege Chris in the mainline QGA). HOWEVER, the thing I think you are catching onto is, I play well imporvising opening moves (I beat a 1900 in 12 moves with a line I was unfamiliar with on move 2), but, as you also know, I sometimes make bad, I guess more often dubious, decisions in the middle game. So, right now, I am working on learning new theory so I dont have to play improv moves against masters and so forth, and studying, Grandmaster Preparation, Calculation, by Jacob Aagaard to help me make better decisions with the middle game. (P.S. I am not titled, Expert is an unoficial titile after one reaches 2000 OTB:)

To your second comment, absolutly, the challenge has been presented, and so I am doing my best to grow the group and place meaningful topics here. And of course, thanks for your comments!

P.S. I'm trying to understand that opening just as much as you are, I was in unfamiliar territory after c5 (I'd seen similar positions but didn't have an undertanding of the position) and I played the wrong system of development. That I think is the main element of the opening for stronger players: not developing your pieces, but figuring out which squares your pieces AND pawns go on. This is where I often fall short, and where proven theory can help me!

Avatar of Faarian

Hi again,

For some reason, I confused you with NM LookingAround which I also played a standard game with:)

Avatar of chessnut45

Thank you very much for this game and your helpful commentary. I am learning alot!!Smile

Avatar of GM_Dude_Chess

Thanks chessnut45! I'm glad this helped you.