NCP - foursquare

Sort:
Avatar of EnterGame

[TimeControl "1+5"]
[Variant "FFA"]
[RuleVariants "DeadKingWalking EnPassant 3-check Prom=5 PromoteTo=VE"]

Games:

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6031847

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6031997

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6047470

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6047566

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6047649

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6047767

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6047812

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6047924

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048002

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048149

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048190

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048266

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048408

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048499

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=6048619

Avatar of BoxJellyfishChess

uhhh... don't you think Foursquare would be better than 4-square? lol

Avatar of EnterGame

like that?

Avatar of BoxJellyfishChess

yeah

Avatar of TheUltraTrap

i want to play that! looks funny

Avatar of KiIls

Takeover would be way better

Avatar of EnterGame
soggydollar wrote:

Takeover would be way better

well, that would make one person way to op, and there are a lot of mate steals

Avatar of MayimChayim

looks boring since nobody is "connected"

Avatar of Train29

no, you promote and than your connected

Avatar of PigOfGuinea

+1, cool! 

looks fun

Avatar of KiIls
Train29 wrote:

no, you promote and than your connected

you promote some of ur pawns then bring ur pieces back and shuffle around then nobody can win.

Avatar of EnterGame
soggydollar wrote:
Train29 wrote:

no, you promote and than your connected

you promote some of ur pawns then bring ur pieces back and shuffle around then nobody can win.

thats where 3-check comes in. theres literally no point in keeping your pieces on your side. you should be attacking.

Avatar of EnterGame

you literally say that on every single one of my variants without considering for a seconds the strategy

Avatar of KiIls
EnterGame wrote:
soggydollar wrote:
Train29 wrote:

no, you promote and than your connected

you promote some of ur pawns then bring ur pieces back and shuffle around then nobody can win.

thats where 3-check comes in. theres literally no point in keeping your pieces on your side. you should be attacking.

calm down dude whats wrong with just proposing something. you don't have to always attack

Avatar of EnterGame

who is gonna join a variant to shuffle their pieces around? 

Avatar of pacingfigure6

man, the armies all stuck between the walls and can't capture/checkmate

Avatar of pacingfigure6

unless they promote

Avatar of EnterGame

that literally is the whole point

Avatar of grable

Yeah, great stuff!

 

We made a minor tweak: 3-check seems very sharp. There are possibilities of suicide checks and high potential for teaming. We upped it to 7-check to discourage that, and it's still just as much fun to play. Nice work!

Avatar of cowaphant
grable wrote:

Yeah, great stuff!

 

We made a minor tweak: 3-check seems very sharp. There are possibilities of suicide checks and high potential for teaming. We upped it to 7-check to discourage that, and it's still just as much fun to play. Nice work!

 

I didn't know you CGA's could actually change a proposed position yourself!