NCP - Adventures of Fireplace Bellows

Time control - 1+0.

Rules - 
Games -

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5617547
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5617513
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5617482
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5617453
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614553

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614511
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614485
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614456
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614441
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614415

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614390
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614369
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614334
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614209
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5614178

Hello,

It seems your posting has not met the minimum requirements for submission, detailed in this thread. Please complete the following requirements:

1. Links to the testing games you played in your position - we require a minimum of 15 testing games, which cannot include any bot players, played over a span of more than 24 hours, and must include a minimum of 8 different players (no aborted, or quickly-resigned games)
   1. Please fix this by adding links to testing games, at least one of which will be played after 3 December, at 14:41 UTC

Thank you. We look forward to reviewing this position.

I played it, ggs, +1

1+ looks fun

+1 It's cool.

+1

looks boring

lol +1 i liek the naem

+1

It doesn't matter

Of course

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5630575

lol

Thank you for meeting the requirements, CGA team will review this position in the near future.

Hello,

Our team test your game. We found some reason to decline this position as NCP:

1.  Low defence. Each people have too low defence at the middle of game and/or when get attacked from 2 or more players;
2. Takeover. On this position with low-check (we try up to 4-check) it might bring up to resignation on 1 of player only for give win points and figures to someone (and figures too);
3. (consequence from 1. and 2.) pre-arrange teaming (especially if one of players is passive).

Thank you. Hope see remake of this position later