WOF - army's

Sort:
Avatar of Train29

1|10

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168507-8

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168533

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168584

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168598

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168639

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5188551

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5188398

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168726

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5168791-17

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5177332-29

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5177448-14

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5177474

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5188295

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5188434

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5188599

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=5188656

rules:

12 check, 11= N

Avatar of Pika_Pokemon

make it wof

it's not equal

-1

Avatar of Train29
Pika_Pokemon wrote:

make it wof

it's not equal

-1

ok

Avatar of Train29
qfcbv wrote:

-1

read the rules

Avatar of grable

Did you mean for the title to be "Armies?"

Also, we still need to see a list of the gamerules which apply, including promotion rank and options.

Avatar of 0SkiIl

this is kind of weird...

where is the promotion rank? -1

Avatar of Tails204

=1

Avatar of Train29
grable wrote:

Did you mean for the title to be "Armies?"

Also, we still need to see a list of the gamerules which apply, including promotion rank and options.

yes

Avatar of Train29

It already says 11th = Knight

Avatar of MrXX2018

Where is a royal piece? I can't see it

Avatar of Train29

yellow g8, green n8, ect.

Avatar of BoxJellyfishChess

This is a very interesting game for us because we have never accepted a Teams WOF before. However, upon testing, we have discovered that blue and green will pretty much always win because the asymmetry of the position allows them to attack the red and yellow kings much easier. Although imbalance is allowed and embraced in WOFs, they need to be fun for the players, and as a teams game, it's not really fun for one side to be much better than the others (the really imbalanced WOFs that were successful, for example KS KOTH CTK, were over very quickly. If you lucked out and didn't get a good color, you could switch games immediately. The games in this variant are short but not short enough so that people won't complain about getting ry all the time and losing... and there will be the added frustration that many partners will not listen to each other). In summary, this could be revised and maybe accepted if the game was made more symmetric and balanced. But for now,

DECLINED

Avatar of grable
BoxJellyfishChess wrote:

This is a very interesting game for us because we have never accepted a Teams WOF before. However, upon testing, we have discovered that blue and green will pretty much always win because the asymmetry of the position allows them to attack the red and yellow kings much easier. Although imbalance is allowed and embraced in WOFs, they need to be fun for the players, and as a teams game, it's not really fun for one side to be much better than the others (the really imbalanced WOFs that were successful, for example KS KOTH CTK, were over very quickly. If you lucked out and didn't get a good color, you could switch games immediately. The games in this variant are short but not short enough so that people won't complain about getting ry all the time and losing... and there will be the added frustration that many partners will not listen to each other). In summary, this could be revised and maybe accepted if the game was made more symmetric and balanced. But for now,