NCP - Pawns square (revised Getting and upgrade)

Sort:
stupnik_2_0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8030410

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8030594

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8036364

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8045016

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8047293-0

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8048209

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8048345

Rules:

Fairy pieces

7 check

Promotion rank: 6th (NG)

King of the hill (april fool happy.png )

Time:

4+5

This is revised Getting an upgrade. Name is diferent, position is diferent. Now walls don't looks like pickaxe (now make line). I changed types of pawns. Now player has 6 pawns, 1 bishop-knight thing and 1 king-knight thing (8 in total) on defence side and 8 pawns and 1 bishop-knight thing (9 in total) on attack side. Pawns can be promoted to grasshopper or knight, so they go from square to another one. (Lot of text, who are reading this)

Please accept and one more time: Happy Easter!

Zhongli-kun_Keqing-chan

10 games

stupnik_2_0
NathanHan3669 je napisao/la:

10 games

10 is evil number

TheUltraTrap

You can use games from gettin a upgrade

TheUltraTrap

Lol hawnk="Bishop knight thing"

hypno56729

this kinda looks like collateral worlds

qilp

Please complete the requirements by adding links to at least 3 games.
CGA-Fix.png

atomized_you

Collateral worlds v2 beta

grable
qilp wrote:

Please complete the requirements by adding links to at least 3 games.

 

I think @qilp forgot that this was a revision of a previously-declined position. 5 test games is sufficient.

CGA-Review.png

angelo_5113

literally colleterial words

samuelysfung
angelo_5113 wrote:

literally colleterial words

Collateral Worlds has theory

MayimChayim
angelo_5113 wrote:

literally colleterial words

Thats what I was thinking when I first saw it

stupnik_2_0
angelo_5113 je napisao/la:

literally colleterial words

No, in collateral worlds there are no grasshoppers, less pieces, diferent gameplay...

Enough?

atomized_you

but atl have the same shape of walls

stupnik_2_0

No

BoxJellyfishChess

The position is sufficiently different from Collateral Worlds, but not in a good way. You've supersaturated the board with pieces, which makes the game slower and duller (for instance, that line of berolinas isn't useful). You also have much more defence compared to Collateral Worlds, which again makes the game longer and drawn-out. There is very high potential for 2v1s and even 3v1s because of the nature of hawks and grasshoppers on an open board (whereas CW has takeover which discourages teaming). The royal general makes mate difficult (again making the game slower), and it can even move to your right flank to hide indefinitely behind 2 layers of pawns. Moreover, there is no conceptual difference between this and CW, so we have no inclination to list both, and CW is a better position. Even if they weren't similar, this position has too many issues to be accepted.

stupnik_2_0

You are SuperMegaGigaEvil

ChilliBeanPotatoes

lol

atomized_you
stupnik_2_0 escribió:

You are SuperMegaGigaEvil

NM CGADeclinerForNCPsChess

NM CGADestroyerIdeasChess

NM DeclinerExperimentedChess

hypno56729
BoxJellyfishChess wrote:

 (whereas CW has takeover which discourages teaming).

uhhh if you haven't noticed, there is a lot of teaming in endgames that is a cold war or an unbalanced position. opposites also team a lot to take down a person without an opposite in 3 player stage xd