✓ NCV ︱ Blackletter Chess

Sort:
josephruhf

Timecontrol

15 | 20

Promotion

Bishop, Chancellor, Archbishop, General, Knight, Queen, Rook on the 10th rank

Note

This is the revised version of Royal Court. Here, the games I am providing are from a corrected version of the previous position where White can capitalise on an exaggerated first move advantage with relatively principled moves. I hope you like it.
CGA
phpJSLljr.png

Status: Accepted

Reason: Quite an interesting variant with a very deep strategy, positional and strategic gameplay implications and overall still having pretty sharp lines and concerns regarding piece placements, with various openings being of a good use; the amount of imbalances is great as well, given you still can get a lot of counterplay by placing only one general to win material, and two generals add up to a lot of mating sequences.

Leothemaster3

frustratedmeh

1Username2awesome3

[Image removed by admin]

Hello @josephruhf

We appreciate the submission, but there just isn't enough variance and interesting ideas to make it different from 2pc. 

Thanks for the submission, The not CGA team

josephruhf

People have already been misled into thinking the position was unacceptable. Though I don’t want it declined, I think the testing should be rebooted from scratch in order to recuperate it. Please post links to the open testing games so I don’t have to play 10 new ones myself.

shell201211
Orion-2000 写道:

Cool

Ban him

josephruhf
shell201211 wrote:
Orion-2000 写道:

Cool

Ban him

He merely disagrees with you. @1Username2awesome3 is actively misleading people into thinking the position was unacceptable.

qilp

Now available at  https://www.chess.com/variants/blackletter-chess

shell201211
josephruhf 写道:
shell201211 wrote:
Orion-2000 写道:

Cool

Ban him

He merely disagrees with you. @1Username2awesome3 is actively misleading people into thinking the position was unacceptable.

I am not focused on that, he’s spamming 

Leothemaster3
shell201211 wrote:
josephruhf 写道:
shell201211 wrote:
Orion-2000 写道:

Cool

Ban him

He merely disagrees with you. @1Username2awesome3 is actively misleading people into thinking the position was unacceptable.

I am not focused on that, he’s spamming 

yeah