NCV | Large Forest

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55641245/76/1

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55641397/77/1

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55641767/23/3

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55641848/4/1

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55643218/31/1

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55643290/36/3

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55643360/39/1

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55694939/29/1

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55695253/16/3

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55760292/28/3

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55826885/114/3

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55839506/27/3

not sure this is still "mini"

Your game list contains quickly resigned games. 
See:

• https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55641707/12/1
• https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55641848/4/1
• https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/55695253/16/3

In addition, although this isn’t a factor used in declining, the name should accurately represent the actual variant, like @Milo543 has stated.

Ok… I will add three today

Fixed. Will it met?

Hi, sorry for the long wait. After testing, what we found was basically that while Mini Forest puts an emphasis on the small space, Large Forest tries to utilize the same pieces; this doesn't really work, and makes confrontation harder as the board is still limited but is so wide that shuffling is also an issue. In general, it's very hard to get v2s of variants accepted.

For these reasons, this variant is: