New custom game

Sort:
Avatar of 1Username2awesome3

I would like to submit this variant, "Forced Mate". 

Screenshot: Yes, I know my game config is boring and lame, but im too lazy to change it. (Plus, I like it this way.)

Rules: 

Capture the King

Ox6 (To encourage capturing with your king)

10-pt checkmate

Games:

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8494644

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8494563

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8494440

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8494451

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=8494472

 

Well, I hope it gets accepted!

 

Avatar of Johnny_Fang

Games?

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3

yeah i just added that i am fixing the thing

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3

I hope those links are right I dont wanna go into my history and scroll for 999 years

Avatar of Zhongli-kun_Keqing-chan

u need 10

Avatar of IntelligentChessOwl8

Yes u need 10 games.

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3

ok I will get some more

Avatar of angelo_5113

REQUIREMENTS NOT MET

Avatar of grable

I'll direct you to the Requirements Thread for posting new custom positions. Please check that your submission meets those, then let us know it's ready.

 


Also, it's a bit concerning to see this:

1Username2awesome3 wrote:

Yes, I know my game config is boring and lame, but im too lazy to change it. (Plus, I like it this way.)

If it's boring and lame to you, the creator, what makes you think it will be any more exciting to other players? We'll only accept positions that we think many players would have fun playing. If this position isn't a likely candidate for that, you should keep working on it until it is, then submit it, instead of what you've done here, which from what I can surmise, is asking us to take a look and give you feedback when we decline it, so that you can make it better. Clever, but also a waste of our testers' time. 

 

I've quoted this before, in my guide to making good custom positions, but it's a message I think you probably haven't seen, or if so, have forgotten:

GustavKlimtPaints wrote:

You really should be doing loads of testing and convincing yourself the position is worth playing and people would have fun with it. Making up a position and posting 5 games with a computer opponent that reflects almost nothing of what the position will look like in play is really just a waste of everyone's time. Play dozens of games and get some people to be interested testers. If you can't get interested testers, well, you probably wouldn't have people wanting to play the position later anyway. The game examples posted should really be QUALITY games of what you think the variant will look like in real games. 

I'm kind of tired of seeing people flood the forum with their CG positions seemingly without having played any actual games with players and expecting their variants to be listed. Please stop wasting the CGAs' time (thankfully I'm not one of them!) and instead put in some time and effort of your own. A good way to try to find players to play your position is to go into some variant game with spectators and ask around.

CGA-Fix.png

Avatar of samuelysfung

@grable I think he’s referring to his game settings, like his piece/wall colours... they are default. I don’t think they relate to the custom position at all...

Avatar of Thy_Pie

@samuelysfung same

Avatar of IntelligentChessOwl8

True configuration is config.

Avatar of DerekRoz

i think it will be fun

Avatar of huiliwang

grable is correct there are only 5 games

Avatar of huiliwang

10 is the minimum number of games

Avatar of huiliwang

but revised, minimum is 5 games

Avatar of huiliwang

First there should be an original NCP

Avatar of huiliwang

then the revised one

Avatar of samuelysfung
huiliwang wrote:

First there should be an original NCP

Just look at the new games lmao

I doubt they’re any original

Avatar of grable

This position has not been updated to meet the requirements since its original posting, more than 2 weeks ago.

CGA-Decline.png