OK, Something’s wrong.

Sort:
Avatar of TheCaecilius

So, first of all, zero brilliants, isn’t it just supposed to say the three highest that you got. And then there is a brilliant? That’s

 confusing.

Avatar of QueenSlider

That is because the engine depth is different from when you actually game review compared to what the quick reweiw says

Avatar of TheCaecilius

Thank you, but why does it say zero brilliants? Shouldn’t it just say 1 great, 4 best, and something else, why does it mention brilliants at all?

Avatar of QueenSlider

prob because you actually had a brilliant in the indepth game review

Avatar of GraffitiPanda
TheShadowFG8857 wrote:

Thank you, but why does it say zero brilliants? Shouldn’t it just say 1 great, 4 best, and something else, why does it mention brilliants at all?

It says it like that so that you have to go to game review to see the brilliant(s) that you made. Its a way of encouraging you to review your games. I think there is also another forum here in Beta that discusses this issue

Avatar of QueenSlider

its also a way to get people to waste their one free game review per day and switch to premium!

Avatar of OperationShark
QueenSlider wrote:

its also a way to get people to waste their one free game review per day and switch to premium!

true but review is also useful if you want to learn on your mistakes

Avatar of TheCaecilius

Yea, that’s probably it, tbh, I just review the best game to review at the end of the day

Avatar of CozilyCastled

everybody finally got over the puzzle thing and now they're all posting about htis

Avatar of EnCrossiantIsBrilliant

I thought it shows a ? if it wants you to review to see your brilliants though

Avatar of PGoshikKumar
TheShadowFG8857 wrote:

So, first of all, zero brilliants, isn’t it just supposed to say the three highest that you got. And then there is a brilliant? That’s
 confusing.

you can copy the game pgn and review you game in lichess. it may not show any brilliant move but it is free to review your game