[Closed] FFA - King Counterchecking #21

Sort:
zisal2029

Game ID: #0021

Status: Closed

Game type: FFA

Variations: King Counterchecking

King Counterchecking: A player can make a move that puts (but no keeping) their own king in check or moves into another spot which would still be check provided they check the player that could capture the king. If this happens, the two players in this situation have some further choices:

  • Either of the two players can get out of check like normal.
  • The two players can capture each other’s kings. They must then place a new king on a square they would like to use (or resign — this might be best when a player has no good spot for a king, based on himself or other stuff) — this step comes before any move of a player who wasn’t in the counterchecking situation. However, in this situation, the new king will not be able to be put in check or kept in check to check the attacker in return, not even for the other players who weren’t part of this counterchecking situation.

Scenario 1: (This will illustrate the new rule more clearly)

It looks like Yellow is absolutely pinning the red queen. However, with the new rule, Red can choose 1. Qxi13+. Let’s say Red plays that and Blue plays 1. - Bxj13.

The yellow arrows show potential options for Yellow.


Now Yellow must capture red’s king in return for Red capturing him back, or get out of check in normal fashion. Getting out of his own check is best here, but let’s say we had 1. - - Bxj1 4xj3 2. Qxj14, and Red decided to place the new king on h1 and Yellow decided to resign.

The old kings have been traded, the new red king is on h1, and Yellow chose to resign instead of placing the second king.

Other rules for Counterchecking: A countercheck can’t be interfered with by another player unless he checks the same player as the original piece. In the case that it happens, the player who had his countercheck interfered gains a tempo to save his king (both players must get out of check in their following moves).

Time: 3 days/move

Players:

Red - @superduolingo005 (REPLACED @Hitsar_Pride)
Blue - @MrXX2018
Yellow - @ChimpReturns
Green - @zisal2029

ChimpReturns

JOIN

zisal2029
wOrLdMasterguy wrote:

why? 

WDYM? Should I re-explain something?

Anyway, waiting for 3 more players.

MrXX2018

Join. Always wanted to play 2PC with rules almost like these

Question:

If A checks B, B counterchecks A, C saves A from the check (without checking by himself), can A just take B's king and checkmate him?

And what will happen, if all the same, but if C takes B's checking piece and check A himself?

zisal2029
MrXX2018 wrote:

Join. Always wanted to play 2PC with rules almost like these

Question:

If A checks B, B counterchecks A, C saves A from the check (without checking by himself), can A just take B's king and checkmate him?

And what will happen, if all the same, but if C takes B's checking piece and check A himself?

Yes, nice thinking, but a countercheck can’t be interfered in a non-checking way. If B’s check is interfered with C’s check, and it checks A, A must get out of check first. This gives the other player time to maybe rearrange some defenses. Likewise, if A’s piece is Captured by C, and it checks B, B must get out of check first (so, in this cases, no capturing each other’s kings).

MrXX2018
zisal2029 написал:

Yes, nice thinking, but a countercheck can’t be interfered in a non-checking way. If B’s check is interfered with C’s check, and it checks A, A must get out of check first. This gives the other player time to maybe rearrange some defenses. Likewise, if A’s piece is Captured by C, and it checks B, B must get out of check first (so, in this cases, no capturing each other’s kings).

You answered only second question

170,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,13,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,12,x,x,4R,1,4B,4K,4Q,4B,4N,4R,x,x,11,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,x,x,x,x,14,x,x,x,x,x,5,3R,3P,10,7P,7R,x,x,8,3N,4N,3P,9,7P,7N,x,x,8,3B,3P,10,7P,7B,x,x,8,3Q,3P,10,7P,7K,x,x,8,3K,3P,10,7P,7Q,x,x,8,3B,2,3P,8,7P,7B,x,x,8,3N,3P,10,7P,7N,x,x,8,3R,3P,4,2P,5,7P,7R,x,x,16,x,x,x,5,2P,2P,2P,1,2P,2P,2P,2P,x,x,6,2R,2N,2B,2Q,2K,2B,2N,2R

In this weird example

1 f4+ c7+c N:a8 ~

Is 2.r Q:a7# legal?

Hitsar_Pride

Join

zisal2029
MrXX2018 wrote:
zisal2029 написал:

Yes, nice thinking, but a countercheck can’t be interfered in a non-checking way. If B’s check is interfered with C’s check, and it checks A, A must get out of check first. This gives the other player time to maybe rearrange some defenses. Likewise, if A’s piece is Captured by C, and it checks B, B must get out of check first (so, in this cases, no capturing each other’s kings).

You answered only second question

170,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,13,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,12,x,x,4R,1,4B,4K,4Q,4B,4N,4R,x,x,11,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,x,x,x,x,14,x,x,x,x,x,5,3R,3P,10,7P,7R,x,x,8,3N,4N,3P,9,7P,7N,x,x,8,3B,3P,10,7P,7B,x,x,8,3Q,3P,10,7P,7K,x,x,8,3K,3P,10,7P,7Q,x,x,8,3B,2,3P,8,7P,7B,x,x,8,3N,3P,10,7P,7N,x,x,8,3R,3P,4,2P,5,7P,7R,x,x,16,x,x,x,5,2P,2P,2P,1,2P,2P,2P,2P,x,x,6,2R,2N,2B,2Q,2K,2B,2N,2R

 

In this weird example

1 f4+ c7+c N:a8 ~

Is 2.r Q:a7# legal?

I thought I did answer 1st question. I said “No countercheck can be interfered with without check”, so C can’t save A from the check without making a new check. Also, your question doesn’t seem to have fitting moves and a picture.

Anyway,

Waiting for 2 more player.

MrXX2018
zisal2029 написал:
MrXX2018 wrote:
zisal2029 написал:

Yes, nice thinking, but a countercheck can’t be interfered in a non-checking way. If B’s check is interfered with C’s check, and it checks A, A must get out of check first. This gives the other player time to maybe rearrange some defenses. Likewise, if A’s piece is Captured by C, and it checks B, B must get out of check first (so, in this cases, no capturing each other’s kings).

You answered only second question

170,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,13,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,12,x,x,4R,1,4B,4K,4Q,4B,4N,4R,x,x,11,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,x,x,x,x,14,x,x,x,x,x,5,3R,3P,10,7P,7R,x,x,8,3N,4N,3P,9,7P,7N,x,x,8,3B,3P,10,7P,7B,x,x,8,3Q,3P,10,7P,7K,x,x,8,3K,3P,10,7P,7Q,x,x,8,3B,2,3P,8,7P,7B,x,x,8,3N,3P,10,7P,7N,x,x,8,3R,3P,4,2P,5,7P,7R,x,x,16,x,x,x,5,2P,2P,2P,1,2P,2P,2P,2P,x,x,6,2R,2N,2B,2Q,2K,2B,2N,2R

 

In this weird example

1 f4+ c7+c N:a8 ~

Is 2.r Q:a7# legal?

I thought I did answer 1st question. I said “No countercheck can be interfered with without check”, so C can’t save A from the check without making a new check. Also, your question doesn’t seem to have fitting moves and a picture.

I mean in the example after 1.y N:a8 red is not in a check anymore (countercheck situation is broken!). So, can it make any move (and is Q:a7 legal)?

zisal2029
MrXX2018 wrote:
zisal2029 написал:
MrXX2018 wrote:
zisal2029 написал:

Yes, nice thinking, but a countercheck can’t be interfered in a non-checking way. If B’s check is interfered with C’s check, and it checks A, A must get out of check first. This gives the other player time to maybe rearrange some defenses. Likewise, if A’s piece is Captured by C, and it checks B, B must get out of check first (so, in this cases, no capturing each other’s kings).

You answered only second question

170,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,13,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,x,12,x,x,4R,1,4B,4K,4Q,4B,4N,4R,x,x,11,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,4P,x,x,x,x,14,x,x,x,x,x,5,3R,3P,10,7P,7R,x,x,8,3N,4N,3P,9,7P,7N,x,x,8,3B,3P,10,7P,7B,x,x,8,3Q,3P,10,7P,7K,x,x,8,3K,3P,10,7P,7Q,x,x,8,3B,2,3P,8,7P,7B,x,x,8,3N,3P,10,7P,7N,x,x,8,3R,3P,4,2P,5,7P,7R,x,x,16,x,x,x,5,2P,2P,2P,1,2P,2P,2P,2P,x,x,6,2R,2N,2B,2Q,2K,2B,2N,2R

 

In this weird example

1 f4+ c7+c N:a8 ~

Is 2.r Q:a7# legal?

I thought I did answer 1st question. I said “No countercheck can be interfered with without check”, so C can’t save A from the check without making a new check. Also, your question doesn’t seem to have fitting moves and a picture.

I mean in the example after 1.y N:a8 red is not in a check anymore (countercheck situation is broken!). So, can it make any move (and is Q:a7 legal)?

If I did allow this kind of move, I wouldn't have let red take the blue king. However, N:a8 is illegal anyway (do I have to keep repeating this, or what should I do to help you out?).

MrXX2018

Another question. To make it simple, let's say 2 players remaining. Can I check my opponent with pinned piece, creating countercheck situation? If yes, can I do it if I'm already under check?

zisal2029

Yes, you might be able to capture an enemy piece with one of your own that’s pinned while checking them back.

zisal2029

Bump. Please join this!

zisal2029

I’ll just join myself to make this start immediately, now that I think about it being too long.

Red (@Hitsar_Pride) to move.

ChimpReturns

I think this will be re-opened as a result...

zisal2029

Well, I will wait 7 days, then he will be officially forfeit. Let's assume he's on vacation, but I can't pause because he has no proof.

ChimpReturns

thumbup

ChimpReturns
zisal2029 wrote:

Well, I will wait 7 days, then he will be officially forfeit. Let's assume he's on vacation, but I can't pause because he has no proof.

Forfeit. @zisal2029 said this seven days ago, as can be seen next to the quote button.

GAME RE-OPENED

ChimpReturns

Your turn, @superduolingo005. You are red.

zisal2029

Wow, thanks.

Blue (@MrXX2018) to move.

This forum topic has been locked