Possible accuracy bug

Hi everyone!

I was analysing some opening ideas and I putted into the analysis board a perfect combination of moves. However, how is White accuracy lower than 100% if everything was perfect?

I don't exactly know if this is a bug, or beta related, but hope this post is relevant for the group.

hmm.... very strange

prob not beta related tho

I thought it was very strange. However, I don't really understand how beta content works and how can the bugs (if this is even a bug) be distinguished.

can you send the game link?

Possible reason is white did not play the best move as the game drew despite white having an advantage. Repetition is not considered by stockfish in analysis and repetition may be the best move even if it leads to a repetition draw as stockfish considers positions not the game. However accuracy reflected that white didnt capitalize on the first move and drew.
That was just a theory,

Here you have it.

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/4uXuhf3i14?tab=review

I didn't really understand what you said, but, as you can see in the print I submitted, White has 3 book moves (book move accuracy is always 100%), 2 best moves (also 100% accuracy), 2 great moves and 1 brilliancy. How can you play best, great and brilliant moves and have less than 100% accuracy? That's my doubt.

stockfish evaluates the move as best but it is not best as it caused a rep draw. Stockfish cannot see that a move casue a rep draw but the cap score can??

also briiliant moves are not always the best move I have seen it

Sometimes brilliant moves are worse than best move but more fashionable.

In stockfish 16 max depth, it is actually a good move, not a brilliant. It says it is an intresting idea, but not the best.

Same

Because not all the moves was top but was still an alternative best move.