Random behavior of the leaderboard's "More" control.

Sort:
Avatar of LegoPirateSenior

When trying to navigate down the ratings on this page:

https://www.chess.com/leaderboard/daily

eventually the "More v" control disappears, and you get something like this (captured in Opera, basic account):

null

or this (Safari, diamond account):

null

So far, the deepest I managed to navigate is this (Safari, diamond account):

null

which I captured as evidence that the place, where navigation stops, is completely unpredictable.

In the past, I had the leaderboard stop at 350 pr 500 members when the control to load more data has disappeared. Others have reported breakage at 1500, and also as low as 200.

Avatar of Christopher_Parsons

Thanks for posting this LPS. I thought that was the way the site operated now. That is quite odd. At first I thought you were mentioning how they change in rating and in relation to their ranking. That will fluctuate by their individual changes and the place that they have, but certainly we should be able to go to some sort of predictable set depth, regardless of who is there and what their rating is.

Avatar of bulletheadbilly

well using the member Page, then clicking on highest rated, then working yourself back by pages, instead of the More button, is probably faster anyways.  

Avatar of MGleason

Pagination would be much more useful for quick navigation than an infinite "More" button.

Avatar of erik

We are working to return the pagination, but it will be capped at 5,000 results. 

Avatar of gambit-man

is there a physical restriction causing you to cap it at 5,000 players?

Avatar of Christopher_Parsons

So at what rating does that cut off at roughly? 

Avatar of gambit-man
Christopher_Parsons wrote:

So at what rating does that cut off at roughly? 

in blitz, atm, 2231...

null

Avatar of MGleason

Probably a bit lower in daily, due to fewer active strong players.

Avatar of Christopher_Parsons

I understand the desire to have server space, but it isn't as if giving us access to the data that is already there anyway, uses any more space or doesn't cost that much more. It is a disservice to the volunteers who help keep this chess working at it's, when they aren't given access to the information that they need. It is also a bit out of place that a person can't look themselves up on a leaderboard and pick opponents of the same rating, as opposed to team matches, open challenges and tournaments, none of which give a member a say in who they play. 

Avatar of erik

It's not about space. Give me a few weeks on this! We'll get it!