Oh I dont understand how one player can get more 5s when he already run out of time.
Ready for some 4-Player-Chess? (Prototype)
Sort:
Read the rules I can not find out how we can have extra time.
This is a great new feature in chess.com. Looking forward to play it. Hope the 4-player chess comes in live chess too.
When will chess.com will officially launch 4-player chess?
Can you also do something to prevent 2 players always trading with each other?
trading with each other just made they lost because the others will attack them when their pieces down.
Feeling-good wrote:
trading with each other just made they lost because the others will attack them when their pieces down.
They get more points than you can get from a king if they just trade a few pieces.
My suggestion is that kings should have more point value or you don't get points if you trade though no points when trading could be hard to program.
Aug 30, 2017
0
#30
It's so much fun! It's sort of like playing at an unfamiliar and fast time control. There's almost no way to keep an eye on everything. Highly recommended!
Aug 30, 2017
0
#31
Found several bugs and issues:
1) I was able to reproduce being in multiple sides of the game
2) If one side exits the browser by accident, there is no way to get back to the game and the clock keeps running out making everyone else wait.
Aug 30, 2017
0
#32
Deductive wrote:
Found several bugs and issues:
1) I was able to reproduce being in multiple sides of the game
2) If one side exits the browser by accident, there is no way to get back to the game and the clock keeps running out making everyone else wait.
Perhaps you should make an individual post for this. Maybe even send the bug report through the "Report a Bug" tool. But definitely a separate thread.
I WANT THIS
Aug 31, 2017
0
#34
Deductive wrote:
Found several bugs and issues:
1) I was able to reproduce being in multiple sides of the game
2) If one side exits the browser by accident, there is no way to get back to the game and the clock keeps running out making everyone else wait.
Thanks! Known and working on a solution!
This is actually really fun!! But these 5/5 games takes too much time finish (almost 20 minutes), 3/0 or 3/2 would be much better . Also chat function is almost necessary for these kind of games. Here is my 1st win.
Sep 1, 2017
0
#36
I am against the chat function. I think it allows all of the other competitors more ability to gang up on you. I won the first game of this I played. The 2nd game I was mobbed by all three players, who passed up chances against the other, to get me out of the game. I think if chat is enabled it should be a two on two game.
Christopher_Parsons wrote:
I am against the chat function. I think it allows all of the other competitors more ability to gang up on you. I won the first game of this I played. The 2nd game I was mobbed by all three players, who passed up chances against the other, to get me out of the game. I think if chat is enabled it should be a two on two game.
This is what makes the game fun lol.. they saw you as a weakling so they feasted on you before attacking each other
We're not ready to go mainstream with a link in the nav for this yet. Just a prototype for now.
We need players to get the word out, @winston_weng. Right now there are not enough players on to keep queues moving quickly.
Thx!