Hf5
Second Upgrade Chess Game
Sort:
fxg6
Q@g6=Q+
Bxg3
Players and pieces in hand:
White: preachingforjesus - elephant, bishop
Black: ichabod801 - bishop, knight
Move List:
1. e4! e5
2. Nf3 Nf6
3. Bc4 Nxe4
4. 0-0 Nc6
5. Re1 Nf6
6. Nxe5 Nxe5
7. Rxe5+ Be7
8. Nc3 d6
9. Re1 0-0
10. d4 h6
11. Qf3 c6
12. N@Qf3=A Bg4
13. Ag3 N@Bg4=H
14. f3 Hh5
15. Af2 g6
16. Bxh6 d5
17. Bxf8 Qxf8
18. Bd3 Re8
19. Ne2 Bd6
20. Ng3 Hg7
21. c3 c5
22. R@Bd3=Q c4
23. Qc2 Hh6
24. Nf1 Rxe1
25. Rxe1 R@Nf6=E
26. g3 Eh5
27. Re3 Hf5
28. g4 Hxc2
29. gxh5 Hf5
30. hxg6 fxg6
31. R@f3=R Q@g6=Q+
32. Ng3 Bxg3
33. hxg3 Qc8
Resign.
Good game. What are your thoughts on the design? I was thinking about allowing/forcing pieces to be broken up into knight/bishop/rook when captured.
Mar 30, 2010
0
#93
with limited pawn promotion as well would be interesting.
I think playing that way is the only way to accurately compare.
If you get it posted let me know, I would like to try it.
Why did you resign? I don't understand what's going on.
Apr 5, 2010
0
#95
Reguardless of which queen he takes with I take his hawk; after which material looks like :
preachingforjesus : Ichabod01
1 amazon = 1x12 = 12 : 2 queens = 2x9 = 18
1 elehant = 1x8 = 8 : 1 rook = 1x5 = 5
1 hawk = 1x7 = 7 : 1 bishop = 1x3 = 3
1 Rook = 1x5 = 5 : 1 knight = 1x3 = 3
1 Bishop = 1x3 = 3 :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
total = 35 : Total = 29
this gives a significant material advantage to me
we might easily end up in a situation where I have three amazons against an amazon and two queens.
if I were him I would probably upgrade my pawns to minor pieces and hope for a mistake by my oponent that would restore material ballance; but I can understand resigning (especially if he evaluates the hawk and elephant higher than me).
29. gxh5