Skvt and Preethielango are cheaters

Proof:

 lol, you didn't proof that they are cheaters, you proofed that they were smarter then you, also long castle is usualy not a good idea, your king was exposed to threat from both lines. What was the next blue's move?, did he take the red queen with the bishop, or not? If he didn't then yes, I'd agree with you. Because I've been once in that situation were two players avoided taking their pieces and even giving mate to each others even though could. They were Spanish speaking.

Lol I definitely 'proof' that they were teaming. Red and blue coordinated there attack by queening first and then they teamed to get rid of me. What are you on about - "they were smarter than you." Better at teaming for sure. For the record he did not take the queen and also if you ask a few other people who  have played with them I'm sure they will give the same response. Castling long as well is totally fine. There is no set rules - all you do is make sure your king is safe and you have a solid position. Stop act like an arrogant prick.

Blue could of not seen the bishop and Red used it as an advantage.

 Why the insult? Probably that's why you didn't post the whole screen so we don't see what you wrote there. That's probably your style, insulting people randomly. If you say your king was in safety you can't really play chess. Someone with your rating should understand it. Long castling is not a good idea, it's a rule, and the proof was your position itself. If you can't be civilised stop posting in forum because people will ignore you in the future. If you can't see that they were smarter then you are dumb and full of yourself. Anyway your position looks like a 1200 rated players opening, so why are you shoked that you lost, so early in the game. Stop acting like a drama queen and improve your opening  instead. There is no such think as cheaters, unless they would use a chess engine, which in our case is impossible, simply they were better then you, period.

Long castling works just fine, if the pieces align. Short castles are also often disasters, if not thought out properly.

I called you an arrogant prick and every bit of that is true. The only reason I called you that was because of the nature of your first comment and you give of the same vibe here as well. What is this nonsense, "they were better than you/ stop acting like a drama queen, etc..." I'm not saying you're a bad player or anything but it is a fact that you are a total arrogant prick.  Btw I was pushing for a queen earlier on so none of my pieces were developed and also who would expect red and blue to make those moves? I am 100 percent sure they are teamers and so do many others. Look at the comments on https://www.chess.com/member/svkt. Ask anyone that plays with these two.

You can't really tell from the screenshots and players teaming up in certain situations is the nature of this game. But people that already go into the game as a team are the biggest thread to the survival of this game. It's cheating and if nothing will be done about it (like banning) then the game will die.

 Not only it's you who's the arrogant but dumb as well because players name (from the title) is svkt, not skvt :-)You obviousely had issues with more people, I read what they said about you:  https://www.chess.com/member/jake_paul7 They tricked you because you are dumb and ignorant lol. I'm glad you lost.

You are most likely troll that should be banned. If my game would have ended this way, I'd also assume teaming. On the other hand, I played vs Preethilango several times and did not notice teaming.  
Unfortunately, 4-player is extremely complex ethically. 

The screenshots show a clear indication of teaming. I would give a 80% chance that the teaming was prearranged before the game, but without seeing the rest of the game I can't be 100% sure.

martonflorian why are you assuming he insulted them? Teaming up on somebody is cheating. They teamed up on him. They cheated. Are you a cheater too? ‘cause you seem to be siding with them!

I was watching one game playing by them, and I confirm that they team up. But it's unlikely that this is the same person though (same country) because at the end lower guy had won. They quickly eliminated two players leaving them exactly 0 and 1 points, then they seemed to play 1v1, but one had already 70 points more than the other

we can add now another player to same cheating network, n14empty. Or preethialango changed his nick. Why are developers ignoring such posts and allow rampant cheating in ffa?

 this is a more obvious proof of cheaters http://imgbox.com/AS32XraX  After I was mated they quit the game. As I said in my first post they were Spanish speaking, I think these two are the same.  When the blue pwan riched the center I new they were teaming. The problem with free for all games is that donors have the option to invite a "friend" I think, in which case is not really a free-for-all game but team game.

No, there is not such option in free for all.

Just because two people go against one person does not mean they should be banned, and here's something to think about, the point of the game is to checkmate people in anyway possible. I've seen games where people are smart enough to coordinate their attacks without teaming, It's called strategy.

So why are you saying this it is'nt against the rules to team or something is it

sorry

Who cares if they were teaming. If I have a friend sitting next to me and wants to play FFA, we have the choice to crush the other players before we 1v1 eachother. Stop crying and either resign and start a new game or get off your chair and go outside. It's that simple.