“!?” Already exists for the “Blunder” so perhaps a better one could be “??”
Some "Progressive" Features
Sort:
austintrzpuc wrote:
“!?” Already exists for the “Blunder” so perhaps a better one could be “??”
!? is already the intresting annotation here's proof:
Site already has Stockfish 15 for Chrome and Chromium based browsers. Should be available for other browsers at some point.
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Site already has Stockfish 15 for Chrome and Chromium based browsers. Should be available for other browsers at some point.
Oh, i'll change it to stockfish 16. I forgot that
Is beta now for suggesting feature or do yall not know what its for?
HappyMasterMike wrote:
BananaMuncher213 wrote:
austintrzpuc wrote:
“!?” Already exists for the “Blunder” so perhaps a better one could be “??”
!? is already the intresting annotation here's proof:
e4 is good
Absolute buffoon, e4 blunders mate in 24
Dr1zzy_D wrote:
HappyMasterMike wrote:
BananaMuncher213 wrote:
austintrzpuc wrote:
“!?” Already exists for the “Blunder” so perhaps a better one could be “??”
!? is already the intresting annotation here's proof:
e4 is good
Absolute buffoon, e4 blunders mate in 24
Scholar's mate is M4, but that is not what this topic is about.
Lost1nInfinity wrote:
Dr1zzy_D wrote:
HappyMasterMike wrote:
BananaMuncher213 wrote:
austintrzpuc wrote:
“!?” Already exists for the “Blunder” so perhaps a better one could be “??”
!? is already the intresting annotation here's proof:
e4 is good
Absolute buffoon, e4 blunders mate in 24
Scholar's mate is M4, but that is not what this topic is about.
I know, I was making a joke
Alright. I don't know what to say, so i'll put the warning down here.
WARNING!
I don't know if there's any alternatives, problems or something off about these 2 features, so comment your opinions down below.
1. Game Review Feedback
So, did you ever see stockfish make an error in the game review? Well, this feature is for you! You just simply press a button and a window pops up asking what's the error, and in what move stockfish did that, after that, there is an optional feature to change the description of the move.. And of course... The Intresting (!?) annotation comes in handy! It is a lazy annotation for annotators. So should be for fixed errors.
2. Stockfish "16"
I mean, why not? Stockfish 12 is a trained by humans bot. It starts from 100 ELO to an engine, smarter than stockfish 15. BUT. We can't just bring the trained by humans each time they play with someone. Let's take it to the next level and make it so after someone plays, they give feedbeck about the errors of stockfish 16. This makes it train more faster than that one bot that was in the bot AI events.
Well, that's all the features i had in my mind. See you soon!