It would need to be clear when a comment has been edited. Otherwise, a rogue SA in a club could abuse this power to make a random club member say something bad to try to get them in trouble with the site.
But, for example:
Person A says: “Nf3 is the best move!”
Person B quotes that comment of person A: “No, Nf3 is a blunder. The bishop on h5 will capture that free knight. So the best move is O-O.”
Then, when person A edits his comment to “O-O is the best move!”, the comment by person A in person B's quote is still “Nf3 is the best move!”. We can detect editing comments by that way. If an edited comment doesn't have a quote, then chess.com should fix it.
It would need to be clear when a comment has been edited. Otherwise, a rogue SA in a club could abuse this power to make a random club member say something bad to try to get them in trouble with the site.
But, for example:
Person A says: “Nf3 is the best move!”
Person B quotes that comment of person A: “No, Nf3 is a blunder. The bishop on h5 will capture that free knight. So the best move is O-O.”
Then, when person A edits his comment to “O-O is the best move!”, the comment by person A in person B's quote is still “Nf3 is the best move!”. We can detect editing comments by that way. If an edited comment doesn't have a quote, then chess.com should fix it.