This is a guide for members who have joined the SugarBlossom Variants Testing Team!
Step 1. What to test?
Wrong: Test the newest first, especially auto-declinable ones. This will likely result in an extreme imbalance between the Under Review time of the submissions.
Correct: Test the not-well-tested ones in Under Review Submissions.
Step 2. How to test?
1. The TC must be the same type as the variant's one. (e.g if the variant has a bullet tc any bullet works)
2. Test with experienced payers/players who have already tested the variant.
Step 3. How to vote?
We have 5 tags, listed below: (you can change your vote with further testing, of course.)
+1 -> I analyzed the elements of the variant, and thinking that it should get accepted/ it is promising for a Pending Reply.
-1 -> The variant has multiple issues found in testing, and I think it shouldn't get accepted.
=0 -> The variant is unclear to me, for now; I just want to stay neutral there.
+0 -> Not clear for now, but likely a promising variant.
-0 -> Not clear for now, but likely hopeless.
Testing Information:
Hi! As the description goes, we are able to fairly vote here.
There're currently 179 testers:
New Custom Variants at +5/-3 Wheel of Fortunes at +4/-3 Modified Variants at +5/-2 Custom Positions at +4/-3 New Extra Variant at +6/-3 Puzzles only need confirmation to accept ViI would be up to communication In case of meeting the requirements with positive votes, there is a 2 days waiting stage before acception
This is a guide for members who have joined the SugarBlossom Variants Testing Team!
Step 1. What to test?
Wrong: Test the newest first, especially auto-declinable ones. This will likely result in an extreme imbalance between the Under Review time of the submissions.
Correct: Test the not-well-tested ones in Under Review Submissions.
Step 2. How to test?
1. The TC must be the same type as the variant's one. (e.g if the variant has a bullet tc any bullet works)
2. Test with experienced payers/players who have already tested the variant.
Step 3. How to vote?
We have 5 tags, listed below: (you can change your vote with further testing, of course.)
+1 -> I analyzed the elements of the variant, and thinking that it should get accepted/ it is promising for a Pending Reply.
-1 -> The variant has multiple issues found in testing, and I think it shouldn't get accepted.
=0 -> The variant is unclear to me, for now; I just want to stay neutral there.
+0 -> Not clear for now, but likely a promising variant.
-0 -> Not clear for now, but likely hopeless.
Testing Information:
Hi! As the description goes, we are able to fairly vote here.
There're currently 179 testers:
New Custom Variants at +5/-3
Wheel of Fortunes at +4/-3
Modified Variants at +5/-2
Custom Positions at +4/-3
New Extra Variant at +6/-3
Puzzles only need confirmation to accept
ViI would be up to communication
In case of meeting the requirements with positive votes, there is a 2 days waiting stage before acception