The person above me is correct.
The person above me knows why the chicken crossed the road.
The person above me knows that he crossed to get to the other side.
The person above me gave away the punch line (shame on you!)
the person above me should make a forum with his 'jokes'
The person above me has a good idea.
The person above me could call it that.
The person above me might read anti-humour for fun.
The person above me should know that I come up with it.
The person above me comes up with jokes that aren't funny.
The person above me should know that I come up with both.
The person above me should know that anti-humour is not supposed to be funny.
The person above me should now that I call it dry humor.
The person above me should know that anti-humour is different from dry humour.
The person above me should give me an example.
The person above me should learn of this knock knock joke:
Person 1: Knock knock
Person 2: Come in.
The person above me should know that I call that dry humor.
The person above me has a different definition of dry humour-- I think of dry humour actually having humour, whereas anti-humour is the lack of humour.
The person above me should know that I think your example is humorous.
The person above me should know that that's one of the more humourous ones (I won't say the most shocking ones- they're not exactly PG).
The person above me is correct.