Top 16 tiebreaks system

I think the tiebreak system for the top 16 standoffs are unfair. I haven't known of this until just a few hours ago. I think it should be played off via blitz games, bullet if necessary, between team captains

team captains are sometimes low rated, so that wouldn't be such a good idea. Also this is a rapid league, not blitz or bullet.

how is it unfair? the best team gets the most tiebreaks, the most tiebreaks wins in case of a tie. So the better team wins....

I guess that makes sense. I'm really new to the league, and I'll have to know more and play here longer to have a more developed opinion on the topic, but as of the moment, I think it's unfair. My mind is open and my opinion may change, but I think that's probably the second best method of deciding (current method)

ya, team captains should play

team captains should not play each other that would not work because there are some 2200 team captains and some 1100 team captains

Yep

I think top seed per team should play