Vicariously-I vs Daybreak57 Game Analysis

Sort:
Avatar of Michael-Holm

Daybreak57 challenged me and asked for my thoughts on the game. I'm reposting the analysis I did for him here because I thought it was relevant to the group and some may find it useful.

To recap:
 
1) 9. Na2 and 14. Rb1 were too passive. Stopping your opponent's ideas is usually good but you should try to do so in a more active way.
 
 
2) On move 11 you played d5. This is not a bad move at all but I would recommend keeping the pawn tension and just castle. That way you retain some flexibility with the d-pawn and keep me guessing what your intentions are.
 
 
3) On move 17 you captured on b4 but you should have reinforced the a-pawn first with b3.
 
 
4) 21. Bxd4 was the decisive mistake. Your dark squared Bishop is your best piece so you should think twice about trading it, even for a Rook. My Queen was also lined up with your King so you have to be very alert to tactical possibilities. 

 

Avatar of zenwabi

Nice game, Mike. How come you gave up OTB play?

Avatar of Michael-Holm

Thanks Jeff! I didn't give up OTB play, I actually never started. I do want to play OTB at some point but it's difficult for me to get to a chess club.

Avatar of MarkGeoffreyMarinay

This is a crystal clear explanation of an analysis that a player of my level could understand. Salamat! 😊

Avatar of Michael-Holm
darknight81 wrote:

This is a crystal clear explanation of an analysis that a player of my level could understand. Salamat! 😊

Glad you found it helpful happy.png