Feel free to comment guys. I'm also a lower level player, so I am sure I made faults in my view of the game, despite also using Fritz to analyze it.
Another thing I think we lack in, is the communication department. I was guilty about that very much. We didn't talk enough, didn't discuss moves.
I think if there is animo for a new votegame we should make the 'rule', before you vote, you say what and why you want to do a move. When a couple of members have outed their favorite moves, only then you actually make the vote. Allthough I don't know if that would work out for all members.
Vote game analyses

Hi groupmembers,
There is good and bad news. The good news is, we concluded our first vote game. The bad news is... we were pretty bad and gave away our queen with absolutely nothing in return for it.
I have to say that I am a bit dissapointed that 9 teammembers could raise enough votes to blunder a Queen. We have a lot of work to do, to raise the level of the groupmembers such that we at the very least see when we are about to blunder the Queen.
Having said that, this group exists for just that reason. To learn from mistakes and become better players.
So, how do you all think about this?
(edit, sorry for the puzzle mode, I have no idea why that happened but can't change it. Quickest way to see the game is to press the questionmark under the game.)