We’re Private now!

Sort:
Avatar of Carlos-Leao

Hey guys!
As we talked about in this thread [https://www.chess.com/announcements/view/big-decision-plz-read], our club is private now.
Since we’re now checking everyone at the door, we need to set some ground rules for new members. We want to keep the club active and clean, especially for our tournaments and Vote Chess.
What do you think our "filter" should be?
Should we require a minimum number of games? A specific account age? Or maybe a rating floor?
Please drop your suggestions below.

Avatar of USERCHEC-k-MATE

We shouldn't have a specific account age, I don't think that's a good idea.

Avatar of Carlos-Leao
USERCHEC-k-MATE escreveu:

We shouldn't have a specific account age, I don't think that's a good idea.

I agree. We just have to be careful with trolls. Any other ideas?

Avatar of ggi2024

i know that im not a cooridinator or anything higher but i think to join a club u must be in 3-5 clubs where the owner says there are trust worthy

Avatar of cello_jello

People should probably have played at least a couple rated games

Avatar of Carlos-Leao
ggi2024 escreveu:

i know that im not a cooridinator or anything higher but i think to join a club u must be in 3-5 clubs where the owner says there are trust worthy

But many people (like me) only join one club to dedicate themselves 100% to it. Instead, I recommend a prior account review to check the number of games played, any suspected Fair Play violations, etc.

Avatar of Carlos-Leao
cello_jello escreveu:

People should probably have played at least a couple rated games

I totally support this. I think we should set a specific minimum, like 50 or 100 rated games, to make sure the account is legit and active. What do you guys think?

Avatar of ggi2024

that does work

Avatar of cello_jello
Carlos-Leao wrote:
cello_jello escreveu:

People should probably have played at least a couple rated games

I totally support this. I think we should set a specific minimum, like 50 or 100 rated games, to make sure the account is legit and active. What do you guys think?

I think probably at least 15 games, cause for new accs 50 is a lot

Avatar of Carlos-Leao
cello_jello escreveu:
Carlos-Leao wrote:
cello_jello escreveu:

People should probably have played at least a couple rated games

I totally support this. I think we should set a specific minimum, like 50 or 100 rated games, to make sure the account is legit and active. What do you guys think?

I think probably at least 15 games, cause for new accs 50 is a lot

15 games is a fair number. I aprove.