Why do most people think the Two Towers movie is better than the Fellowship of the Ring movie?

Sort:
theitalianstallione

Why do most people think the Two Towers movie is better than the Fellowship of the Ring movie? Fellowship is more faced paced entertaining and action packed. Even the music in Fellowship was better. It is in my favorite 10 films of all time I just don't understand what went wrong. Two Towers is a complete different movie.

AlbAmchess

because

AlbAmchess

Also it’s really not action packed

and no the music for the fellowship of the ring was worse than return of the king or the hobbit movies

Brudo_the_Chess_King
AlbAmchess wrote:

because

/\

jdh1
AlbAmchess wrote:

Also it’s really not action packed

and no the music for the fellowship of the ring was worse than return of the king or the hobbit movies

Yeah. I agree. Helm's Deep is super epic and way more action packed than anything in FOTR. And plus, Gollum.

theitalianstallione
AlbAmchess wrote:

Also it’s really not action packed

and no the music for the fellowship of the ring was worse than return of the king or the hobbit movies

Its pretty fast paced and keeps you on the edge of your seat the whole time. They are always moving in the 1st one

AHHButcher

I agree with all that!

OnlyExecute

Because in the 2 towers u get to see Legolas surf downstairs on a shield 

sagmartin

I liked all of the movies pretty much equal, but I don't have that high of an opinion of them. Maybe it's cause I watched the normal, not the extened version, but it didn't go by the book that much.

sagmartin

Yes absolutley @TroutNinja

sagmartin

Best part of all the movies combined

OnlyExecute

i have seen extended and regular versions extended is wayyy better 

AHHButcher

yeah!

jdh1
sagmartin wrote:

I liked all of the movies pretty much equal, but I don't have that high of an opinion of them. Maybe it's cause I watched the normal, not the extened version, but it didn't go by the book that much.

They follow the books more than most other movies that are based on books.

Hannah_Stanfield

I don't know

I like the movies pretty equally or usually think of them all as one big story instead of three different movies 

AHHButcher

Yes, that is how I feel.

Hannah_Stanfield

We own the extended version 

AHHButcher

AWESOME!

Hannah_Stanfield

it is! 

sagmartin

@jdh1, they leave out huge gaps and add dumb stuff

Let me give you some examples

Tom Bombadil-left out

The Scouring of the shire-left out

For some weird reason, all of Rohan goes to Helm's deep. In the book, the warriors go there, and the women and Children go to Dunharrow-add

Faramir takes Frodo to Osgiliath, with the intent of taking the ring to Minas Tirith-add

Boromir and Faramir both have blond hair in the movie, while they have dark hair in the book (Minute detail, but I noticed and it bugs me) 

In the book, the army of the Dead only go to the attack the Corsairs of Umbar, and then leave. In the movie, they just go and attack on the field of Pellenor-add

At the entrance to Mordor, Frodo sends Sam away for 'eating' all the lembas waybread. In the book, nothing of the sort happens.-add

In the movie, Pippin and Merry at first fail to convince Treebeard and the Ents to go to Isengard, but in the book, they convinced them practically right away. -left out

In the movie, they leave the Shire like in a day, but in the book it's literal years.-left out

I could go on. And on. And on and on and on.