Why is my accuracy so less?

Sort:
CAPTAINSAMARTH

I played a blitz game today and i played pretty well but my accuracy and game rating are extremely less

Link to the game

https://www.chess.com/game/live/107428346674

SigmaM8

Oh man, it just wasn't a good game. Congratulations on winning, but it was your opponent who lost more than you won...

CAPTAINSAMARTH

but y is my accuracy so less ?its not like a played a bad game

CAPTAINSAMARTH

and thx

naviwinn

If it was a short game than even a small amount of inaccurate moves greatly affects the game rating

CGM-12

It was a short game and you made such a bad blunder on move 6. What if white responded with bxf7? You would have been dead. Besides that you made a bunch of other mistakes and blunders too. Your game couldn't really be called good. It was your opponent who was bad. Congrats on winning though🏅

king2f8
CAPTAINSAMARTH wrote:

but y is my accuracy so less ?its not like a played a bad game

you did play a bad game though

Qualtom

brother you arent that good!

king2f8
Qualtom wrote:

brother you arent that good!

who me?

HasiLo
CAPTAINSAMARTH hat geschrieben:

but y is my accuracy so less ?its not like a played a bad game

The Game was terrible

king2f8
HasiLo wrote:
CAPTAINSAMARTH hat geschrieben:

but y is my accuracy so less ?its not like a played a bad game

The Game was terrible

my point is

Martin_Stahl
CAPTAINSAMARTH wrote:

but y is my accuracy so less ?its not like a played a bad game

Accuracy is a relatively objective measure. While it's not a direct one-to-one engine match algorithm, if it if gives a low accuracy, you have very few closely matching moves

ath0000
CAPTAINSAMARTH wrote:

I played a blitz game today and i played pretty well but my accuracy and game rating are extremely less

Link to the game

https://www.chess.com/game/live/107428346674

You won the game because your opponent managed to get a 100 rating somehow

Neithersafenorsus
ath0000 wrote:
CAPTAINSAMARTH wrote:

I played a blitz game today and i played pretty well but my accuracy and game rating are extremely less

Link to the game

https://www.chess.com/game/live/107428346674

You won the game because your opponent managed to get a 100 rating somehow

It is not that difficult to get 100 ELO estimated rating for new to chess players, actually (e.g. I have a friend that is 500 on Chess.com but sometimes plays like a 100 and sometimes like a 900).

ChessChamp169GM
naviwinn wrote:

If it was a short game than even a small amount of inaccurate moves greatly affects the game rating

true

YHplaychess

move 2, that's not how scandinavian is played, you're supposed to sac the pawn, not recapture.

move 3, queen still vulnerable

move 4, 1. knights before bishops 2. queen still unsafe

move 6, nice find

move 8 & 9, good job

move 11, nice catch

move 12, nice find

move 13, 💰💰💰

While there were plenty of good moves, the small inaccuracies matter a lot in a 13 move game. After all, each move contributes to more than 7% of the game's overall accuracy.

Neithersafenorsus
YHplaychess wrote:

[...] While there were plenty of good moves, the small inaccuracies matter a lot in a 13 move game. After all, each move contributes to more than 7% of the game's overall accuracy.

It's not a direct proportionality.