Winning Against Someone 600 More Than Me!

Sort:
Avatar of ChessKy538

I was just playing people of random ratings for fun in the Unrated mode and I beat someone who was 1400! That's a big difference! Here's the game. Let me know what you think! happy.png

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/85269629583?tab=review

Avatar of Aditya_chessplayer121

noice job! stockfish thought your opponant was 350! You were really good but there was a lot of mises

Avatar of XpiredRuby

Good Job. It always feels good to beat someone higher than you. 600+ points is definitely impressive happy.png

Avatar of Absolute-Chaos

You post a lot here meh

Avatar of Aditya_chessplayer121

who does

Avatar of JayDB24

Nice, you played very well for your rating!

Avatar of Absolute-Chaos
Aditya_chessplayer121 wrote:

who does

@ChessKy538 I see so many post by him no joke

Avatar of GreatoduTheFirst

i beat a 2700 when i was 1900

Avatar of RandomElephantt102

Congratulations! It must be a good feeling to beat someone 600+ elo higher then you!

Avatar of RandomElephantt102
SpectorZero wrote:

can u not post a lot its annoying

Just let him post, you can disable forum notifications, it's not that hard.

Avatar of KingMonkey400

Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:

Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.

Thanks,

KM400

Avatar of XpiredRuby
KingMonkey400 wrote:

Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:

Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.

Thanks,

KM400

He's just a 800. When you were a 800, could you see the moves back then? Let's be kind.

Avatar of KingMonkey400
XpiredRuby wrote:
KingMonkey400 wrote:

Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:

Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.

Thanks,

KM400

He's just a 800. When you were a 800, could you see the moves back then? Let's be kind.

I was just being honest bro, no need to take a high moral stance, I wasn't gonna lie. I said nice job anyways, bc it was a good game for that level, and there were a few pretty good moves.

Thanks,

KM400

Avatar of MaxThomas9312

Im sorry but that was terrible. Despite the rating difference that was no game to be proud of. My question is where are those people in my games. He was terrible.

Avatar of XpiredRuby
KingMonkey400 wrote:
XpiredRuby wrote:
KingMonkey400 wrote:

Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:

Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.

Thanks,

KM400

He's just a 800. When you were a 800, could you see the moves back then? Let's be kind.

I was just being honest bro, no need to take a high moral stance, I wasn't gonna lie. I said nice job anyways, bc it was a good game for that level, and there were a few pretty good moves.

Thanks,

KM400

I wasn't taking a moral stance, but pointing out the obviousness. Though I get your POV.

Avatar of XpiredRuby
KingNinja14 wrote:

Im sorry but that was terrible. Despite the rating difference that was no game to be proud of. My question is where are those people in my games. He was terrible.

True, but he's a 800.
I would also be darn happy if I beat a GM even though the engine points out the fact that we both have terrible accuracies lol.

Avatar of KeresCrusader

I beat an 1800 once in blitz as a 700 with a brilliant rook sac, highlight of my career

Avatar of XpiredRuby
KeresCrusader wrote:

I beat an 1800 once in blitz as a 700 with a brilliant rook sac, highlight of my career

Same situation, but in rapid happy.png

Avatar of Staerex

Here I am. I have lost to a 1200 and 1000. Chess is a beautiful game, you make a single big mistake on the board and the game is over.
My best win is against an NM. I was 1800 and the NM was 2400

Avatar of Wind

Chaotic fun game! gg!