noice job! stockfish thought your opponant was 350! You were really good but there was a lot of mises
Winning Against Someone 600 More Than Me!
Good Job. It always feels good to beat someone higher than you. 600+ points is definitely impressive ![]()
can u not post a lot its annoying
Just let him post, you can disable forum notifications, it's not that hard.
Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:
Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.
Thanks,
KM400
Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:
Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.
Thanks,
KM400
He's just a 800. When you were a 800, could you see the moves back then? Let's be kind.
Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:
Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.
Thanks,
KM400
He's just a 800. When you were a 800, could you see the moves back then? Let's be kind.
I was just being honest bro, no need to take a high moral stance, I wasn't gonna lie. I said nice job anyways, bc it was a good game for that level, and there were a few pretty good moves.
Thanks,
KM400
Im sorry but that was terrible. Despite the rating difference that was no game to be proud of. My question is where are those people in my games. He was terrible.
Ok, nice job. But my brutally honest thoughts:
Neither of you played very well. Lots of inaccuracies on both sides, as well as blunders and missed wins. That discovered check to win the rook was a pretty good move, did you see the winning of the rook or did you just check bc you could? While not a very high performance from either of you, it still always feels good to beat someone that much higher than you, even if it is a dirty flag! So nice job, and keep improving.
Thanks,
KM400
He's just a 800. When you were a 800, could you see the moves back then? Let's be kind.
I was just being honest bro, no need to take a high moral stance, I wasn't gonna lie. I said nice job anyways, bc it was a good game for that level, and there were a few pretty good moves.
Thanks,
KM400
I wasn't taking a moral stance, but pointing out the obviousness. Though I get your POV.
Im sorry but that was terrible. Despite the rating difference that was no game to be proud of. My question is where are those people in my games. He was terrible.
True, but he's a 800.
I would also be darn happy if I beat a GM even though the engine points out the fact that we both have terrible accuracies lol.
I beat an 1800 once in blitz as a 700 with a brilliant rook sac, highlight of my career
Same situation, but in rapid ![]()
I was just playing people of random ratings for fun in the Unrated mode and I beat someone who was 1400! That's a big difference! Here's the game. Let me know what you think!
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/85269629583?tab=review