well your not supposed to are you stupid?
its zugzwang once everything else is gone
bruh
WOF: Chamber of executioners is unfair :(
Sort:
GreenKing1000 wrote:
I think it's unfair, 'cause, as soon as you try to promote your royal pawn, the other player can KOTH inmediatly
YES! i agree im not joking really. I mean out of the 10 pieces I have I find that the only one I ever feel compelled to move is the one that loses. And that is why I think this otherwise amazing/fantastic and well built and very fun WoF is horrible and the admins should take it down so THERE this is NOT joke I completely agree here are the reasons right in front of your face!
lol
lol
Jan 21, 2022
0
#5
Well-, then don't try to promote you royal pawn? Also, that's the whole point of the game.
Ghanext wrote:
and then if promote it the player is won
Oh, really? Maybe then you should TRY TO PROMOTE
A lot of people think WOF's are too unfair! LOCK THIS NOW.
Jan 23, 2022
0
#9
GreenKing1000 wrote:
I think it's unfair, 'cause, I've never played a pawn endgame in my life and I think zugzwang is hacking
JkCheeseChess wrote:
GreenKing1000 wrote:
"I think it's unfair, 'cause, as soon as you try to promote your royal pawn, the other player can KOTH inmediatly"
The point is to not promote your royal pawn: it's to last as long as possible before you are obliged to (no other legal moves) or to checkmate the opponent's royal pawn (as seen here).
Tomtday wrote:
"YES! i agree im not joking really. I mean out of the 10 pieces I have I find that the only one I ever feel compelled to move is the one that loses. And that is why I think this otherwise amazing/fantastic and well built and very fun WoF is horrible and the admins should take it down so THERE this is NOT joke I completely agree here are the reasons right in front of your face!
lol"
1. There are not 10 pieces, only 6 (24 if you count pawns).
2. Red has 12 possible moves on the first ply and Yellow has 13, resulting in a total of 156 different positions after just the first move, only one of which results in an immediate loss.
You are not "compelled to move the one that loses". It is completely up to you. There are no other reasons that this one, so there's not much of an argument here.
lol there is six... maybe you didn't count the ones with the wazirs and ferzs and stuff like that that make no sense... also lol I love how you take my 'compelled to make the one that loses' and completely forget that sarcasm exists lol (or you just have zero idea what it is)
did I ask?
JkCheeseChess wrote:
Tomtday wrote:
JkCheeseChess wrote:
GreenKing1000 wrote:
"I think it's unfair, 'cause, as soon as you try to promote your royal pawn, the other player can KOTH inmediatly"
The point is to not promote your royal pawn: it's to last as long as possible before you are obliged to (no other legal moves) or to checkmate the opponent's royal pawn (as seen here).
Tomtday wrote:
"YES! i agree im not joking really. I mean out of the 10 pieces I have I find that the only one I ever feel compelled to move is the one that loses. And that is why I think this otherwise amazing/fantastic and well built and very fun WoF is horrible and the admins should take it down so THERE this is NOT joke I completely agree here are the reasons right in front of your face!
lol"
1. There are not 10 pieces, only 6 (24 if you count pawns).
2. Red has 12 possible moves on the first ply and Yellow has 13, resulting in a total of 156 different positions after just the first move, only one of which results in an immediate loss.
You are not "compelled to move the one that loses". It is completely up to you. There are no other reasons that this one, so there's not much of an argument here.
lol there is six... maybe you didn't count the ones with the wazirs and ferzs and stuff like that that make no sense... also lol I love how you take my 'compelled to make the one that loses' and completely forget that sarcasm exists lol (or you just have zero idea what it is)
I'm simply making a point: if you're going to talk bad about something and ask for it to be downgraded or removed, you should have actual evidence and reasons why it should. And, for your information, I counted every single piece on the board and the number of move options for each player, so even then, you're wrong. Also, how is what you said sarcasm in any way? It seems completely real to me... " i agree im not joking really"
#@jkcheesechessDoesNotKnowWhatSarcasmIs
lol I was
my brother told me it was laying the sarcasm on too thick lol
Jan 27, 2022
0
#15
TomiET wrote:
chesswhizz9 wrote:
ARE WE NOT LOCKING?
Yes is it true that many people think so but why are you playing then?
in reply i do play the decent looking ones with exeption of @the hawk hunters, lone king war ect you can see now hmmm wofs are suposed to be unfair this just another topic that dosent matter on any thing and plus once you know the concept its easy to play.
Thankyou I think ive made my point also your grammer is incorrect :]
Jan 28, 2022
0
#17
#@jkcheesechessdoesnotgetthepointandheisacoo-rdhaveiatleaststatedmythoughtsplusiminadifferentcountrywemightspellthingdifferentylikethewordijustsaidok
Jan 28, 2022
0
#18
I said might and I have nothing more to say because I'm not "HOSTING AN ARGUMENT "
I think it's unfair, 'cause, as soon as you try to promote your royal pawn, the other player can KOTH inmediatly