WOF - Check!

Sort:
Avatar of ChessDemon732

Game Links

Avatar of BoxJellyfishChess

tbh I think red and yellow should not be zombies

Avatar of ChessDemon732
BoxJellyfishChess wrote:

tbh I think red and yellow should not be zombies

Randos add unpredictability to the game.

Avatar of Tyler329

you know you only need to have TEN testing games not like 50

Avatar of TheUltraTrap
Tyler329 wrote:

you know you only need to have TEN testing games not like 50

but if the game gets popular he can add 50

Avatar of TheUltraTrap

wait there are only 23 hours of games

Avatar of EnterGame

who cares about a 1 hour difference

Avatar of EnterGame

its actually a 7 minute difference

Avatar of KiIls

with red and yellow randos it makes it so that basically no one can win. 

Avatar of ChessDemon732
Tyler329 wrote:

you know you only need to have TEN testing games not like 50

I had to make sure that there were 8 people playing so that I meet Requirements

Avatar of ChessDemon732
soggydollar wrote:

with red and yellow randos it makes it so that basically no one can win. 

Not always. Did you check the testing game links?

 

Avatar of KiIls
ChessDemon732 wrote:
soggydollar wrote:

with red and yellow randos it makes it so that basically no one can win. 

Not always. Did you check the testing game links?

 

that cuz one player always blunders for no reason

Avatar of ChessDemon732
soggydollar wrote:

that cuz one player always blunders for no reason

Do you think a 1997 rated player blundered here?

Avatar of qilp

Hello.
Thank you for posting the new WOF game. We reviewed this position and came to the following conclusion. Moreover, personally, I did a lot of tests trying to improve this position. The problem is that there are too many chances of ending the game in a draw, which is bad for a WOF. So the only thing we can suggest is to diversify your position. I tried to change zombie type, number of checks and other things, but it didn't really help, there are too few pieces on the board to make it good enough.

For these reasons,