Status: Declined
Reason: The games are largely dependent on zombies: if no zombie promotes into a royal, the game is a trivial draw. If one zombie promotes or both promote, it is usually just decided by sheer luck who gets the mate due to the queen and bishop placement.
Theoretically there is about a 1/9 chance that the zombie will directly use the king to go up the hill
Probabilistic Analysis
e5=>f6 =1/3 f6=>g7 =1/3 promote king =1/4 Then there are 4 similar things in total *4
1/3*1/3*1/4*4=1/9
another way
e5=>f? =3 possibilities, F?=> g? 3 possibilities, promote =4 possibilities, king on g7 = 1 possibilities
Then there are 4 similar things in total
1-((3*3*4-1)/(3*3*4))^4=0.10656661998(from calculator)
I'm not sure if this affects whether this can be a WOF because...
turn 4
turn 3
So... turn 3=2/3*1/3*1/3*1/3*1/4*2=>1/81(0.01234567901)
prototype
part of the inspiration
Green wins!!!
The hills are the "only possible" way to turn defeat into victory
Hill =4+3+2(all that left)
Checkmate = Stalemate = 4 Then 3 Then 2
Risks of Stalemate
Risks of Stalemate#2
green didn't win (confused)
some tips :
In the early , you can choose to reduce the opponent's pawns or your own pawns
try to reach the hill when the opponent's pawns are less enough.
It's just personal opinion
"a tie" but based on luck
The probability that a zombie has a king: 1-(3/4)^4=0.68359375
Special thanks to: Ian_Orwell for playtesting and data support; but I'm not sure if this is enough strategy or luck or if this is a forced tie or something
Why can there be a draw except for zombies? There is definitely a question of precedence. This is P4M. If A and B are Stalemates at the same time, then A is red, and A gets the Stalemate's P4M score first, then A wins.
If both A and B get P4M score still the same concept
And when A wants Stalemates to win, A will face certain risks
Have you tried A with stalemate tactics but B with hills?
Or B keeps some pieces to attack A?
It's impossible to draw, except for Zombie Hill and Checkmate opponent
Or zombies make A into Stalemates
mxQl10# , yellow wins
The stalemated player wins?
THREEFOLD REPETITION 50-move-rule. I don't know how to avoid procrastination problems
#just testing...
1. When A gets the "one" Checkmate, B can still win via promote King and then King of the Hill (very difficult)[You need to make the opponent unable to promote and reduce most of the pieces and keep the pieces that can be promote]
similar concept
2. When A and B both get Checkmate, there are still Stalemates and Checkmate opponent victory condition
like a picture of a "simple test"
3. I only see that the draw is based on luck or the THREEFOLD REPETITION,50-move-rule, but like the screenshot of the simple test, I don't know how to draw
Conclusion: The draw probability is less than or equal to 1/9(?)
When A gets 48 points, B can still win by getting 36+24 points, but A has to find a way to get Stalemates or get a Checkmate to win; In other words: B must use hills
Only when the strategies of both sides are similar and no one chooses to promote the king and both sides are almost equally affected by luck, there is a so-called "draw" or "luck determines the result", but in most cases, luck only provides advantages or disadvantages, and the score advantage is still Need to face the situation that the opponent can reach the Hill
Timecontrol
1 | 3Gamerules
Play for Mate, 5-check, King of the Hill, Stalemate WinsPromotion
Transparent Brick, Brick, Rook, King on the 7th rank