2500 coach
Would you rather
Sort:
2 days ago
0
#3
I would go with a 2500 FIDE coach and GM due to the fact that there is open communication and also can easily adapt to helping me learn is one of the big things as coach that any coach should try to have at least also my reason that I would not choose the other one is due to the lack of clear communication and also there is not a clear line of how he could explain things and to me Elo doesn't matter too much, just the ability to coach very well
2 days ago
0
#4
2500 because I don't really need that much knowledge from the teacher doesn't even know how to teach...Like the 2800 should've try to uhmm...Go to an university and apply for the teaching major (I meant that he'll learn that major so he can become a better version of himself at teaching), because what matters is what you've got from the teacher, not what the teacher's got.
Edit1: Why are y all sending punches toward me 😭, I was just giving advice for the 2800 teacher and I explained the reason I chose the 2500 is because I think that I can learn from him more than what a skilled 2800 with that teaching skill to teach me 😭.
2 days ago
0
#5
Sometimes I watch chess games here of players with a rating of 2000+ and they can make up to ten textbook moves when opening, I can barely make four.
2500
2 days ago
0
#8
Supergamer4799 wrote:
Imagine your a 2000 FIDE player. You seriously need a coach as you want to become an IM.
You got two options for coaches and took their trail coaching lessons. Based on your experience which coach would you take. Take this as a would you rather question, avoid any bias, imagine yourself and choose for yourself. Both options have their own pros and cons and reason for someone to choose them
•A 2500 FIDE coach and GM. He has very enthusiastic communication, socially skilled with nice behavior. He has the ability to explain things related to chess in a more fluent, clear way. He also is adaptable to your learning
•A 2800 FIDE coach and GM. He is not disrespectful, but not very communicative and socially good. He often takes time to explain things and sometimes gets confusing. He struggles to adapt according to you, mostly relying on his own journeys for your coaching.
Trial*
2 days ago
0
#9
Seriously 2500 FIDE GM is extremely good, I don't see why I need a 2800 super GM just to coach me to IM. If I am rated 2500-2600 myself though, I would prefer the 2800 since the 2500 cannot really teach me much xD
the 2500 coach because the 2800 one is not a good teacher and, in that scenario, I might be looking for a good teacher, not a good chess player
Imagine your a 2000 FIDE player. You seriously need a coach as you want to become an IM.
You got two options for coaches and took their trail coaching lessons. Based on your experience which coach would you take. Take this as a would you rather question, avoid any bias, imagine yourself and choose for yourself. Both options have their own pros and cons and reason for someone to choose them
•A 2500 FIDE coach and GM. He has very enthusiastic communication, socially skilled with nice behavior. He has the ability to explain things related to chess in a more fluent, clear way. He also is adaptable to your learning
•A 2800 FIDE coach and GM. He is not disrespectful, but not very communicative and socially good. He often takes time to explain things and sometimes gets confusing. He struggles to adapt according to you, mostly relying on his own journeys for your coaching.