Do I have any talent for chess?


Every time I lose a game, I'd feel inferior because I keep feeling that the people who beat me didn't study chess. I think that they can beat me with pure intuition with no preparation like Capablanca. Is this true or not? You can look over my games if you want. I'm confused.
Maybe they have higher IQ?
no, you are just not good and need to improve more

Ratings with bots, ratings with puzzles and all that is not games versus humans, you can forget about it, there is just zero reliability in these.
If you've got a super car, like a Ferrari, but put no gas in it, it won't roll much. Same if you forget the tires. Or neglect water for colling the engine. Etc. Chess is the same: you need to have enough work put in various areas of the game. For what I've read from others, you neglect openings for one thing, then surely spend actually little to no time analyzing your own games by yourself. I bet you never trained yourself on a board to basic endgames and so on.
And so, you could aswell ask us if you've got any talent in anything where you neglect the fundamental technics you need just to perform it "normally". Like you'd try to blow a saxophone without bothering the shape of your lips: it would not matter then, how correct and accurate the position of your fingers is.
So, just claim you got insulted again, or, if you want to find out about your talent in Chess, learn the basics of the sport, and hey, learn the basics of sports at all: you need appropriate training and self discipline if you want to succeed, not do random gestures and hope for a master piece to happen.
And quit whinning btw, it's annoying, and not very brave of you.
Im actually impressed with those examples lol

Ratings with bots, ratings with puzzles and all that is not games versus humans, you can forget about it, there is just zero reliability in these.
If you've got a super car, like a Ferrari, but put no gas in it, it won't roll much. Same if you forget the tires. Or neglect water for colling the engine. Etc. Chess is the same: you need to have enough work put in various areas of the game. For what I've read from others, you neglect openings for one thing, then surely spend actually little to no time analyzing your own games by yourself. I bet you never trained yourself on a board to basic endgames and so on.
And so, you could aswell ask us if you've got any talent in anything where you neglect the fundamental technics you need just to perform it "normally". Like you'd try to blow a saxophone without bothering the shape of your lips: it would not matter then, how correct and accurate the position of your fingers is.
So, just claim you got insulted again, or, if you want to find out about your talent in Chess, learn the basics of the sport, and hey, learn the basics of sports at all: you need appropriate training and self discipline if you want to succeed, not do random gestures and hope for a master piece to happen.
And quit whinning btw, it's annoying, and not very brave of you.
k

I asked for help, and all I got are insults. What a surprise. Grow up, kids.
No! ... people said that you need to apply what you learned in games and to have more time on the clock so you can think not just place. But you took that as an insult and said that they were dumb when they were just trying to help you.
no you should play more games the more you play the more you get better
Nope bro. If you play games and do not analyze there will be no improvement.