Is 1550 a good rating? - Chess Forums - Page 2

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#21

theendgame3 wrote:

Penguin wrote:

theendgame3 wrote:

that is not readable

?? I've shared it with other people and they can all read it fine. Something on your end...

You really thought they read all of it?

My opponent did. Him and I are good friends IRL and we discussed my anotations.

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#22

theendgame3 wrote:

Penguin wrote:

theendgame3 wrote:

Penguin wrote:

theendgame3 wrote:

that is not readable

?? I've shared it with other people and they can all read it fine. Something on your end...

You really thought they read all of it?

My opponent did. Him and I are good friends IRL and we discussed my anotations.

Oh I thought you said "other people"- my bad.

Other people commented on it. They didn't nesacarily read it all, bu they acnowledged that they read parts of it

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#23

theendgame3 wrote:

Penguin wrote:

Again, if I were cheating why, like completely why, would I go to that much trouble analyzing and learning from my game. I was playing super well that day last week. My opponent (Sho) scored a higher accuracy than I did. Yesterday we played again. I scored 81% he scored 99%. Is he a cheater? If I cheated my account would be closed. I have suspected 4 people ever for cheating. I reported all 4 of them. The first 3 had their accounts closed. The 4th one was just yesterday and I fully expect his to be closed soon. Chess.com has super good cheat detections system, and my account isn't closed (meaning I'm not cheating). Anyways, in b4 da lock

No one has said you was "cheating"

You strongly implied it

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#24

TheLNB wrote:

knightbishop2020 wrote:

@penguin

Your acct looks VERY sus idk why you'd be talking so much stuff

Thanks for being the one to say it. I checked it out and it raised red flags too. 90% plus accuracy almost every game and a 70% winrate...yeah. And then in games toward the bottom of the match history he has 25% accuracy and gets dominated.

Also, might I mention. I checked my first few games. None of them were even near 25%

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#25

@penguin

Your acct looks VERY sus idk why you'd be talking so much stuff

Thanks for being the one to say it. I checked it out and it raised red flags too. 90% plus accuracy almost every game and a 70% winrate...yeah. And then in games toward the bottom of the match history he has 25% accuracy and gets dominated.

Another Ouch!!

Literally this. If you don't consider this as strongly implying then... well idk what to say.

JackRoach

Jan 24, 2021

0

#26

Better than me. And I'm probably the best in my middle school.

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#27

TheLNB wrote:

knightbishop2020 wrote:

@penguin

Your acct looks VERY sus idk why you'd be talking so much stuff

Thanks for being the one to say it. I checked it out and it raised red flags too. 90% plus accuracy almost every game and a 70% winrate...yeah. And then in games toward the bottom of the match history he has 25% accuracy and gets dominated.

Also, 64.5% win rate. one sec:

Win rates for a randomly selected place on the leaderboard: 72%, 53.1, 68.2, 63.2, 47.3, 48.1, 81.5, 60.1, 75.7, 73.8, 50.4, 47.7, 67.1

8/13 people >60%, 6/13 higher than me

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#28

theendgame3 wrote:

1. That is not me, you said I "strongly implied it"

2. Where does it say "cheat" or "cheating"

3. There is no 3.

ANOTHER OUCH!!! You supported the person accusing me

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#29

But anyways. I'm done. I reported you, @theLNB, and @knightbishop2020 for verbal abuse. I am also showing this thread to the first online mod I can find so they can lock it.

zumiYstinsit

Jan 24, 2021

0

#30

I haven't played any games vs another person yet. I hope someday I can get over my fear and play as well as you have!

I was like that too for years. Only played against a computer. Didn't think I was good enough to waste anybody's time. I got over it by doing lots and lots of puzzles, then I felt I could try to find puzzle situations in games. Then I played people and found they blunder too. Play 10/0 games and take your chances. The worst that could happen is you need to resign. Then analyze the games. People just want a game from somebody who tries. Nobody's going to be insulted by a really bad game against a complete novice. They'll just shrug and move on.

Penguin

Jan 24, 2021

0

#31

theendgame3 wrote:

1. That is not me, you said I "strongly implied it"

2. Where does it say "cheat" or "cheating"

3. There is no 3.

Still no answers. Wonder why? 🤔

I QUOTED IT TWICE!! I REPORTED THIS THREAD TO BATGIRL, HOPEFULLY SHE'LL BE HERE SOON TO CHECK IT OUT YOU TROLL

batgirl

Jan 24, 2021

0

#32

This thread is mostly attack and defense so I'm locking it.

@Andreas192192 - you're doing better than most. I'd call you a strong intermediate.