Is chess.com safe for children?

Sort:
Avatar of P_S_S_23

there are ways to monitor your child on chess.com and the forums they use. Just look on the recently visited forums thing on the bottom of your home page and scroll through them.

Avatar of ltristam

LOL RONALD!

Avatar of IcyTexture
I'm an 11 year old kid and my parents let me use chess.com freely. My chess coach and parents are completely fine with it. For those of you think chesskid has the same level of play as chess.com ur wrong. I'm about a 1000 uscf and chesskid is for unrated to 600ish. Chess .com also has much more learning features ex. articles, blitz and rapid games, games longer than 15 min, daily puzzle, improved tactics trainer, premium membership is better, lessons, and game analysis.
Avatar of ltristam
PolarChess wrote:
kaynight wrote:

Do not do it!

 

This guy is a troll, just ignore.

wrong

Avatar of ReddyJ

my opinion: ive seen people post forums called "how long is your thing?" and the comments made references to very inappropiate content(it wasnt showed,but referenced) despite the fact the poster was talking about tactics trainer, so in my opinion, dont let the kids get online to forums, because the right people can make the right kids wrong.

Avatar of SilentKnighte5

This place isn't even safe for adults.

Avatar of JGambit

Chess.com is about as safe as elementary school. Which is to say not at all.

Avatar of JamieDelarosa

Cap't Crunch

Avatar of Pulpofeira

Or a gangsta king.

Avatar of RussBell
Coach_Leo wrote:
thegreat_patzer wrote:

ok, so

I don't understand

what is the danger, exactly?

 

why isn't blocking people from a kids wall good enough??

 

I'm surprised that you need to ask.  The #1 reason is sexual predators.  #2 Cyber bullies.  #3 Hate-speech.  #4 Obscene words and images. #5 Phishing for parents' credit card numbers.

 

(By "obscene" I mean words or images that glorify cruelty or promiscuity.)

 

At this point someone usually asks "why shield children from reality?".  The answer: to allow them to remain innocent for a little while longer (they will have plenty of "opportunities" to be corrupted and demeaned in high school).  Remember, I'm talking about pre-adolescent children, not 16-year-olds.  I think preserving young childrens' innocence for a few more years is well worth the effort.

Common sense, well articulated by Coach_Leo....

Avatar of badger_song

I haven't been born yet.As a fetus, I can declare I feel perfectly safe playing and chatting on this site.If,however,you have any doubts as to the safety of this site,you should contact "help and support" and express your concerns and seek their input.

Avatar of bunicula

being an undead bunny, my declarations are ignored

Avatar of advancededitingtool1

sure it is, but only if they can play blindfold, with me obviously, I don't think kaynight's IQ can handle the stress, therefore I'm here to give a hand or should I say a brain

Avatar of baodown
Avatar of badger_song

All small mammals,and many larger ones as well,welcome the special input of undead rabbits.It is an unfortunate fact,however, that the declarations of undead bunnys often fail to generate that special excitement created by the proclomations given by undead rhinos,elephants,and...dare we say...Tyrannosaurs.Still,the wise know that when the undead bunny appears,in all of its gaunt and ghostly splendor...it's best to listen.

Avatar of jennydarren
Just let them play stockfish
Avatar of SilentKnighte5

People who consistently get notes on their wall like this usually get them for a reason.

Avatar of nimzomalaysian

This thread needs to be locked, I see no difference between this thread and a thread about cheating. It's bad publicity for Chess.com

Avatar of Coach_Leo
nimzomalaysian wrote:

This thread needs to be locked, I see no difference between this thread and a thread about cheating. It's bad publicity for Chess.com

 

If this thread is bad publicity, do you think it's because the safety concerns are exaggerated, or because they are legitimate (and should be swept under the rug), or because of some other reason?  Children's safety is a sincere concern for most parents, as it should be.  Imagine the impression that parents would get if they were told not to ask about it.

Avatar of nimzomalaysian
Coach_Leo wrote:
nimzomalaysian wrote:

This thread needs to be locked, I see no difference between this thread and a thread about cheating. It's bad publicity for Chess.com

 

If this thread is bad publicity, do you think it's because the safety concerns are exaggerated, or because they are legitimate (and should be swept under the rug), or because of some other reason?  Children's safety is a sincere concern for most parents, as it should be.  Imagine the impression that parents would get if they were told not to ask about it.

Nice. So why not say the same thing about cheating? Why is that considered bad publicity? Are those concerns exaggerated? Or because they are legitimate (and should be swept under the rug), or because of some other reason?