Who has the best, (not necessarily longest,) bio?

Sort:
RuffledZest

My bio

Woollensock2
Jeez again a load of weird stuff ! 🙀
JackRoach

Can someone be actually serious?

llama47
JackRoach wrote:

Can someone be actually serious?

I was being serious. By coaching us that length isn't the only criteria, you're implying length one of the most important criteria... but that's silly.

JackRoach
llama47 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

Can someone be actually serious?

I was being serious. By coaching us that length isn't the only criteria, you're implying length one of the most important criteria... but that's silly.

True, but I can't say, "not necessarily the highest quality bio," because it's pretty much the winning bio.

llama47

Yeah, so just say "who has the best bio?"

JackRoach
llama47 wrote:

Yeah, so just say "who has the best bio?"

I wanted to imply quality over quantity.

 

Or maybe I did more quantity under quality.

llama47

Think of it this way, what if I asked people to tell me which cars are best, but then I remind them: "not necessarily the cars with the biggest tires."

For most people that wouldn't make sense.

But ok, I guess you were worried kids would suggest spammy garbage bios that go on and on.

sndeww

OH GOD THOSE BIOS THAT MAKE YOU SCROLL FOR DAYS

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:

OH GOD THOSE BIOS THAT MAKE YOU SCROLL FOR DAYS

Exactly. Those are the worst. They just go like.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Get trolled

JackRoach

Except with 100x the dots

llama47
JackRoach wrote:

Except with 100x the dots

Chess.com log 49275

It's now hour 4 of scrolling and still no sign of words. I'm beginning to lose hope. It may be another "get trolled" bio, but I want to believe this time something good is waiting for me at the end. Food supplies are low, but I'll keep scrolling as long as my fingers have strength.

JackRoach
llama47 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

Except with 100x the dots

Chess.com log 49275

It's now hour 4 of scrolling and still no sign of words. I'm beginning to lose hope. It may be another "get trolled" bio, but I want to believe this time something good is waiting for me at the end. Food supplies are low, but I'll keep scrolling as long as my fingers have strength.

It's the same with my bio, but at least I entertain while they scroll, instead of being bluntly and pointlessly redundant with dots.

sndeww

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.

Why do we have to limit our writing to history textbooks?

sndeww
JackRoach wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.

Why do we have to limit our writing to history textbooks?

I’m not going to *dignify* this post with an actual response 

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.

Why do we have to limit our writing to history textbooks?

I’m not going to *dignify* this post with an actual response 

Then why did you write one?

sndeww

no

JackRoach

Bios can be whatever the author want them to be.

 

As a wise philosopher once said, "I refuse to limit myself to other people's imaginations." It sounds noble, and you can use it when you try to get out of writing a boring essay or something if you're really desperate.

sndeww

Bio is short for biography. About you. Scrolling is not part of that.