Who has the best, (not necessarily longest,) bio?

Can someone be actually serious?
I was being serious. By coaching us that length isn't the only criteria, you're implying length one of the most important criteria... but that's silly.

Can someone be actually serious?
I was being serious. By coaching us that length isn't the only criteria, you're implying length one of the most important criteria... but that's silly.
True, but I can't say, "not necessarily the highest quality bio," because it's pretty much the winning bio.

Yeah, so just say "who has the best bio?"
I wanted to imply quality over quantity.
Or maybe I did more quantity under quality.

Think of it this way, what if I asked people to tell me which cars are best, but then I remind them: "not necessarily the cars with the biggest tires."
For most people that wouldn't make sense.
But ok, I guess you were worried kids would suggest spammy garbage bios that go on and on.

OH GOD THOSE BIOS THAT MAKE YOU SCROLL FOR DAYS
Exactly. Those are the worst. They just go like.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Get trolled

Except with 100x the dots
Chess.com log 49275
It's now hour 4 of scrolling and still no sign of words. I'm beginning to lose hope. It may be another "get trolled" bio, but I want to believe this time something good is waiting for me at the end. Food supplies are low, but I'll keep scrolling as long as my fingers have strength.

Except with 100x the dots
Chess.com log 49275
It's now hour 4 of scrolling and still no sign of words. I'm beginning to lose hope. It may be another "get trolled" bio, but I want to believe this time something good is waiting for me at the end. Food supplies are low, but I'll keep scrolling as long as my fingers have strength.
It's the same with my bio, but at least I entertain while they scroll, instead of being bluntly and pointlessly redundant with dots.

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.
Why do we have to limit our writing to history textbooks?

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.
Why do we have to limit our writing to history textbooks?
I’m not going to *dignify* this post with an actual response

A bio is for reading, not for scrolling. It’s not funny or entertaining.
Why do we have to limit our writing to history textbooks?
I’m not going to *dignify* this post with an actual response
Then why did you write one?
My bio