A logical follow up of 'Amateur's Mind: Strategy - Tactics

Sort:
penandpaper0089

I got the abridged version of Pachman's books used on Amazon for a lot less than $50 lol. Also I don't think the three volume set comes in English anyway. 

RussBell
Fedec wrote:

Hi.

Little update. I just finished Weapons of Chess and took some notes from it. I understand now why it was recommended. It's and easy read, but it's enough of a read to be easely and effectively assimilated. Chapters were brief but well explained enough to be understood and memorised. I read some chapters more carefully than others (I read everything, just didn't took notes from every pages). 

The structure of the book is a little weird, but not a big deal. He talks about pawns structure in many chapters but not in order (talks about types of pawns, suddenly about visualisation, then comes back to pawns, then goes to paired bishops, then back to central pawns...).

I particularly like the "types of pawns" chapter around the beggining/middle (looking for outposts, blocade cases, weak bases central pawn structure part, variation calculation part and analyse part (as the little exercices about visualisation around the end). 

I'm a little sad that he didn't go more trough the analyse part in the beginning. This really helps me and i feel like i was doing a ton wrong on this part that some more "tips" would have been even better! 

The same goes with the chapter "avoid errors" wich basicaly tells be to be concentrated the whole time and move carefully. It's good to be reminded of that but not that usefull (although the part were they told me not to look for fancy moves but more solid moves reminded me of some games)

Now, i'll slowly reread the notes that a took (4 full pages). Maybe go back to some chapters that i might have passed to fast. 

Tomorrow arrive my other books. When i'll feel ready (around middle/end of next week) i'll start Emms book about opening principals. I'll continue to update my thoughts on them

 

Cheers!

Fedec - you are doing the right thing.  If you continue on your path of studing these good chess books, you are sure to become a very good chess player!

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-equipment/good-chess-books-for-beginners-and-beyond

By the way.  "Weapons of Chess" is organized like a encyclopedia (not like a texbook), with the topics arranged in alphabetical order.  One can skip around in the book at will.  However, once you have completed the book you will have learned the same material had it been presented in textbook format.

RussBell
penandpaper0089 wrote:

I got the abridged version of Pachman's books used on Amazon for a lot less than $50 lol. Also I don't think the three volume set comes in English anyway. 

Ludek Pachman's strategy book(s) is/are very good, if not excellent introductions to the subject for the novice-intermediate player.  However, the three volume set is very heavy, dense reading.  Not for the faint of heart. Better for the chess novice to stick to the abrigded, one-volume version (certainly to start with...but it should be sufficient).  

By the way, all the books are published in English language editions.  But they are also written in Descriptive (not algebraic) notation.

"Modern Chess Strategy" by Ludek Pachman (the single volume, abridged edtion)....

https://www.amazon.com/Modern-Chess-Strategy-Ludek-Pachman/dp/0486202909/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1479166650&sr=1-2&keywords=ludek+pachman+modern+chess+strategy

Fedec

Hello everyone! Another little feedback, as promised! I just finished reading discovering chess openings by Emms. To be completely honest, it wasn't AS helpful as announced. It is a great beginner book, no doubt. But it didn't (for me) brought as much as I hoped about opening games. Becaus it is very brief in it's lessons (wich isn't bad). It really just emphasize on basics principles with games examples. Those games, and it is somthing I still have difficulties in chess books, still demonstrate specific lines and profiles. At last but not least, what I didn't like, is that you kind of have to find out for yourself your lessons from the games. For some it won't be a prob. In the contrary. But I kind of felt let down. BUT I insist on saying that IF you have no openings skills or knowledge and you're willing to put the energy and concentration for a first book, it is great! I just started (yesterday) S. Polar tactic book for champs. Since I haven't even been through half yet, my opinion might not be mighty. But it is AWESOME. exercising tactics is the best way to learn the by far! I did what has been advised on the forum: 10-12 exercices per chapters and redo it once or twice a day the same one. It will sink in eventually. I feel it. I will create a thread, soon, about chess openings book for beginner. I'll obviously be inspired by Russbell's list. But It won't be the same :) Cheers!!

jambyvedar2

So you started the Polgar book. The best has yet to come. That is a great book for its intended audience. I suggest you try to solve all the problems in that book.