Yes, that's a very nice set.
Again, I'd never use a nice wood set for blitz. If plain plastic was insufficiently hefty, I'd get a weighted plastic set (else, I might have a heart attack when pieces started hitting the floor during a violently played blitz game, and worrying about that possibility would distract my attention from the game itself).
I've played thousands of OTB blitz games with assorted types of pieces, and have never felt plain solid plastic pieces made the game any less fun. A set like this would be something to aspire to if today's budget does not permit such a purchase.
sftac
ps. Portability is important, the point about a vinyl (leatherette) board (or rather pricier, the leather variation) rolled into a tube (I use mailing tubes cut down and painted to carry them) is a good one. Solid wood boards are awkward, clumsy to carry about but perfect for really serious chess.
Since you're asking, I can't help but plug my own, I designed these:
http://bestchessmenever.com
-Izmet
Nice pieces, but in an important match, I would object to using these. I like the modernistic design as art, but not as a serious playing set.
Traditional Staunton (which still admits some variety) is best.
When I was shopping for my set, the king's cross and the knight's design helped me rule out many sets. I eventually settled on
http://www.houseofstaunton.com/the-reykjavik-ii-series-chess-set-3-75-king.html
in rosewood and boxwood.