Qualitative difference, not just quantitative. It is like a person with strategic knowledge who knows when something is correct without the need for calculation...
And Sargon is like neurotic overthinker of everything, because lack of direction.
E.t., not knowing when and what to eliminate as not viable and vis shorten it's thinking.
But his depth (Sargon's) also has no limits? Stockfish on 1 ply/1 second, would he understand position better than Sargon left for 7 days to think about position (on the newest hardware, of course)?
Edit: I have 3 dedicated comps: 2000+ elo, 1500+ elo and 1400+ elo. My aim is to find dedicated chess comp of about 1300 human elo rating, just slightly above my peak rating ≈1250 (chess.com graphs are incorrect) but aesthetically pleasing (chess) comp, not toyish, at least...