How can I find games by titled players that had to deliver checkmate with knight and bishop?

Sort:
Avatar of nova-stone

Hi!

As of late, I'm looking for games played by titled players in which one side had to deliver checkmate with knight and bishop. Can anyone show me a solid and reliable way to find these games, for example in the online ChessBase database?

To be clear, I'm not asking for a list of games, or the link to the ChessGames site. I'm asking for a search method that demonstrably works.

Thanks in advance!

NS

Avatar of Toldsted

Why should they be titled? Most +1600 players can do that easily. I have even won otb with 2 knights against a pawn.

Avatar of nova-stone
Toldsted wrote:

Why should they be titled? Most +1600 players can do that easily. I have even won otb with 2 knights against a pawn.

I'll happily relay in DMs why, if you must know. But can you help me with the question I asked?

Avatar of nova-stone

Thanks GPT

Avatar of nova-stone
ChessShadowsofZhadum wrote:
nova-stone wrote:

Thanks GPT

That was Google AI. And it says your welcome.

I am not sure why most people know about these tools, but do not use them for these kind of questions.

That might actually be an interesting question to ask Google AI. See what it comes up with.

Avatar of nova-stone

It has no idea, that is. Good.

Avatar of sawdof
nova-stone wrote:

How can I find games by titled players that had to deliver checkmate with knight and bishop?

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1049752

Avatar of nova-stone
sawdof wrote:
nova-stone wrote:

How can I find games by titled players that had to deliver checkmate with knight and bishop?

https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1049752

Like I said in the first text, this is what I didn't ask for.

Avatar of thedelcai

...

Avatar of nova-stone

https://www.chess.com/blog/nova-stone/a-bish-of-a-knightmare Here's the result of it.

Avatar of nova-stone

If anyone is wondering why you shouldn't ask GPT to teach you checkmating with bishop and knight: it's utterly rubbish at explaining it. See for yourself:

https://www.chess.com/blog/nova-stone/appendix-the-full-exchange-with-gpt