hurt ouachita hurt ouachita
Heinzie's right. It's not valid. (Though I have to admit that I do agree with you)
hurt ouachita hurt ouachita
Heinzie's right. It's not valid. (Though I have to admit that I do agree with you)
so it doesn't matter that ouachita is not a chess engine? I think apple pie is also good, why didn't we nominate it too? :(
Apparently there is a chess.com joke that I don't know about. Ask someone else for the details because they will be able to explain it better, but I didn't realize that Ouchita wasn't an engine until someone pointed it out and explained the joke to me. I wouldn't want a non-engine on there in the first place, but the rules don't say I can remove non-engines from the competition, so it would be illegal to remove Ouchita. I'm hoping that it will get eliminated legally and a legitimate engine will win. I'm afraid someone found a hole in the rules and I can't do anything about it. :(
jtt96, um well 1 points is incorrect grammar.points is plural....
That's an excellent points.
jtt96, um well 1 points is incorrect grammar.points is plural....
You mean on post 1? If so, It's because it doesn't seem worth it to rename the point/points every time something hits 1. (should that 'to' have two O's?)
If you saw it on one of my later posts, It's probably just a typo.
Sarah Palin isn't a real politician either but she'll receive plenty of votes too. It's all about popularity ;-)