Something old. Something new. Something borrowed. And... nothing blue.
Old 1940s chess set (3.5" kings). New birdseye maple board (2" sq). And borrowed Anri Universum "Satellites" for pawn promotion stand-ins. No, I have not yet had the chance to use either of them as such in a game. BUT they are at the ready if the time ever comes 
nice board and satellites
This is my new chess set.
I wanted those polish style kings and queens and I wanted red chess pieces.
I ordered them extra without a board and they came with green felt. But green felt on red pieces is for me a no go. So I changed it. I ordered an extra board for this polish style pieces.
It is not big. Field size: 33 mm. I know this pieces are not high end (especially the knight), but I love this set anyway. It is a perfect size for analysing.
@GambitHawk
Oh yes, The Royal Maxi ... I like it. I knew this and I found always the queen and King great on this set. They look similar to the chess symbols.
I was wondering, how me romanian hungarian Chessmen would look on my new board. It is great. But I'm not sure, if it is a tiny bit too stuffed? I think it is okay ... what do the experts say?
The rook is hanging over the board? Come on ... after a few moves a few pieces will missing and then it will be okay.
I was wondering, how me romanian hungarian Chessmen would look on my new board. It is great. But I'm not sure, if it is a tiny bit too stuffed? I think it is okay ... what do the experts say?
The rook is hanging over the board? Come on ... after a few moves a few pieces will missing and then it will be okay.
I think an even smaller board will suffice. It will eliminate the pieces rather quickly for fast endgames.
Haha ... well said. You are the expert. 
@GambitHawk
Oh yes, The Royal Maxi ... I like it. I knew this and I found always the queen and King great on this set. They look similar to the chess symbols.
Agreed. Some hate the design, I like it. I'm sure you've seen the Ambasador as well.
Pure love for these pieces <3
@verylate
Of course, 2120 is way too crowded. This was a joke btw.
I hate it even, when the pieces have the same size as the field.
The piece shouldn't go over 80% with the diameter from the fieldsize.
This is a rule which I follow allways. 75% is the best ratio in my opinion.
@GambitHawk
Oh yes, The Royal Maxi ... I like it. I knew this and I found always the queen and King great on this set. They look similar to the chess symbols.
Agreed. Some hate the design, I like it. I'm sure you've seen the Ambasador as well.
Is it a polish design? I have seen it many times but never have known what it is called or the history behind it.
I was wondering, how me romanian hungarian Chessmen would look on my new board. It is great. But I'm not sure, if it is a tiny bit too stuffed? I think it is okay ... what do the experts say?
The rook is hanging over the board? Come on ... after a few moves a few pieces will missing and then it will be okay.
too crowded..... they need a board that fits them.. : ) maybe a new board??
My Dubrovnik 1950 chess set,made with 3D printer
I have painted all pieces from the start,and put lacquer after
The result satisfies me
My Dubrovnik 1950 chess set,made with 3D printer
I have painted all pieces from the start,and put lacquer after
The result satisfies me
Very very nice panosliak, congratulations!
Also, hate to be that guy, but the white square is on the right ahaha, great work anyways.
My Dubrovnik 1950 chess set,made with 3D printer
I have painted all pieces from the start,and put lacquer after
The result satisfies me
Very very nice panosliak, congratulations!
Also, hate to be that guy, but the white square is on the right ahaha, great work anyways.
Thank you IIFabreis
haha) it depends how you see it.Your point of view is the left "side".It's just a photo
Yes sure my man, I was being extremely fussy ahaha. Enjoy your beautiful work
Very nice.It's good to see non standard designs.Love it.
Is it non-standard, or a very old standard?
I think the Staunton design was the first standardised pattern in 1849.
That raises an interesting question about standardisation. Seeing so many Staunton variations everywhere, is Staunton really a pattern which is more standardised than other patterns? And why is everyone assuming it was the first standardised pattern? What about St. George, Northern Upright, French Régence etc.? And what exactly qualifies as Staunton pattern, based on which criteria?