The one thing I've gathered over the nearly 3-year run of this thread is that there is no ONE style of 1849 Jaques knight. Apparently, Jaques used several carvers who produced a number of slightly different knights all based on a common theme. With each carver probably thinking that his version was better than the rest. After all, who's to say that the few surviving 1849 sets represent all the early variations?
Given all these various styles, the question becomes one of preference. Which style do you prefer?
Personally, the 1849 is not my favorite Staunton design. The most apparent imbalance is the king, which, compared with the remaining pieces, looks like it belongs to a set two sizes larger.
[from the Crumiller collection]
I appreciate the historical value of the set, being the originator of our present de facto standard design, but I'm more interested in the aesthetic value of a set than its historical accuracy -- are the pieces scaled properly, are the knights beautifully rendered, with quality woods and excellent craftsmanship?
My favorite Staunton style set would be a properly scaled set (see below) of my favorite individual Jaques pieces rendered on a common pedestal design, and available in a number of other colors besides ebony and ebonized boxwood.
A rescaled rendition. Pardon my crude Photoshop skills.
What happened to Carl's posts?
There was an excellent photo in which it looked like the Queen may have only had 8 points.
I've never seen that in a large club before.
The knight also looked like it may have been carved by the same person who carved my favorite knight.
To me that's the kind of thing I want on this post.
People sharing information and knowledge;
and also giving their honest opinions about what they like and don't like.
Unfortunately, I didn't take a picture of that set before it got removed.
RC would you mind giving your opinion about your favorite knight(s)?
I think as collectors we might be able to help ourselves get knights reproduced that we like.