I guess if you have the extra cash, and it's something you like, then that's fine, but in general I wouldn't recommend getting a coach. You can collect the basics yourself faster and for less money.
The basic areas (IMO) are: openings, tactics, strategy, endgames, and annotated game collection.
IMO until you've seriously studied one good book in each of those 5 areas a coach is unnecessary.
A good one to start with is annotated game collection, tactics or endgames. A bad one to start with is openings.
An example of a good annotated game collection book to start with:
https://www.amazon.com/Masters-Chessboard-21st-Century-Richard/dp/1936490218
And an endgame book:
https://www.amazon.com/Winning-Chess-Endings-Everyman/dp/1857443489
And a tactics book:
https://www.amazon.com/Back-Basics-Tactics-ChessCafe-Chess/dp/1888690348
Just get 1 and study it thoroughly is my advice. Set up a board and play over all the analysis in the book, and take notes in a notebook.
Any beginner who reads those books (or similar) and plays a little every day (even if it's just blitz) should gain a few 100 rating points within a year. Of course you're a family man, so maybe only 100-200 points in a year, but considering 5 hours a week that is respectable IMO.
My goal is to learn and be able to understand more. Not trying to go pro at chess or anything like that. Long term 100-200 rating point increase would be nice long term.
Am I a good candidate for someone to coach me from time to time?
Also what is a typical lesson price?