18363 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Technically, Scott's play is considered above average, while Yereslov's is considered about average according to Chess.com's statistics.
1.d4 is better!!!
Both of you don't stand a chance against me today. This is one of my "good" days where I play at the level of an IM.
OK dude, have fun with that.
I am. How about a game?
Sure, send me an online game.
Actually just seen your rating, bit of a waste of my time.
Seriously, if you are considering a career in comedy, or think using subtle cheating tactics will work for you, I understand, but you aren't going to sucker me with that...
If I used engines, I would have never lost to Conquistador.
Just because you haven't in the past doesn't prevent you from doing so to someone...
And just because you haven't murdered anyone today doesn't mean that you won't murder someone tommorow.
How does that tie in with our original topic ?
It's sarcasm. The whole argument about what can and what can't happen is absurd.
One would think, based on your statement, that you are confused, considering you started the hypothetical talk about Tal's play...
All that fascinating rot aside, as black, I'll tell you that I tend to have the most fun against e4.
I've always found 1. e4 offered a better game as white. It gets the KB out quickly which facilitates castling, and while it invites the Sicilian, I'd rather face that defense than the Kings Indian or Grunfeld. But it's mostly a matter of taste.
Nameno, what I stated is a fact. Most of his sacrifices are refuted by modern chess theory and analysis.
Don't you ever let anything just go, Yereslov? Always one more go at saying some inane point again instead of clamming up and slinking offstage.
Uh-oh. He may be sending you a challenge, Doc. You know, since he is playing at Master level now.
If he's playing at master level, he's using a computer, since he seems to be a 900 player in the flesh. We won't have to worry about him bothering us for much longer, if that's the case.
Express if you like or do not like the new version of the site
by MSRBruce a few minutes ago
You should study openings
by MyRatingis1523 a few minutes ago
The best chess swindle.
by BronsteinPawn 3 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 5 minutes ago
Why I never play chess online
by PaullHutchh 9 minutes ago
Fischer vs Karpov
by DarthRevan79 10 minutes ago
Do I have the potential to be a GM one day??
by kindaspongey 11 minutes ago
Does Karjakin even have a "puncher's chance"?
by Candidate35 12 minutes ago
Message to Chess.com Staff
by david 13 minutes ago
Allowing take backs
by Martin_Stahl 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!