1.d4 2.c4 is cheating

Yeah Grünfeld can be too complicated for one with a rating of 1000. I remember when I bought two books about this opening (both were Grandmasters' repertoire by Boris Avruh [or something, I'm not that good with names :) ]) and it had a lot material to learn. KID could be the opening for you - there is usually ways to avoid the long theoretical main lines and to have positions which you can just play.

Yeah booked up fish probably don't think they can develop genuine chess skill so gravitate towards memorizing theory and hoping for the best. 

I really love this bookies....they memorize each line till the book ends with the comment "and white is better", but they dont know why and their first move out of book starts the catastrophe :D

Thats why i play unsound openings, because "standard opening bookies" start to sweat when you play 1.d4 Nf6 and then 2.g4...

Tell me about g4 move, show games please.

I disliked his video. 8 dislikes now!

Well I tend to mostly play classical openings nowadays, since the best moves can usually be found with the sound guiding principles of classical chess and it's fairly easy to find good moves once you are out of book.

1.d4 Nf6 2.g4 - I love it when my opponents get creative like this with an "irregular opening." I may be out of book early in the game, but I still get to apply the same principles in a favorable setting.

If someone has trouble finding good moves once they are out of book, they just don't understand the opening they are playing. This applies to any opening...

you are invited to look at my archive, i have played plenty of games wth this gambit or to get a member of our Gibbins-Weidenhagen-group...

I agree that KID is a great response to QP openings.  However, the Budapest Gambit is not great for black unless white is just not familiar with it.  I think that White's winning percentage is around 44%, which is extremely high.  I believe that GM Seirawan published an article claiming that the Budapest is "busted," meaning that he found a winning line for white that black had no meaningful counter to.

As a general rule (and this may or may not help you) I don't take gambits against anyone I suspect of having an evil plan - there are some exceptions (staunton's gambit in the Dutch), but taking a gambit can sometimes open your position and alter your pawn structure in ways you aren't ready to handle immediatly but your opponent is.....particularly when you play blitz against stronger players. If they offer you a pawn in the first three moves, JUST LEAVE IT ALONE and whatever crappy idea they got from "Doctor Blortkins' 97 ways to get checkmate on move 6" is no longer going to work. The reason these traps aren't sprung very often is that people just don't fall for them....I actually don't play e3 when my opponent takes the gambit - I play e4 because I am a geek for positional advantages, and I would rather have the center than play for a trap that only weak players will ever fall for. 

If you really want to see a big pile of silly chess traps, look at the KING'S gambit.....that thing has produced more noobgasm victories than any other opening in chess. 

you can try to learn one of the Indian Defenses. (Nf6)

i don't like to block bishop (g7) with knight, if i dont move knight coz is on good square at nf6, bishop is block for most of the game. that is my problem. i need to improve before i use that defense.

A general idea in King's Indian is to reroute the bishop to f8, where it defends d6, protects the center, and allows black to pawnstorm white's king

You have to trust your fianchetto bishop to come to life when it needs to - I see a lot of people who don't know what they're doing play the Sicilian dragon and try to develop their knight to h6, and this is just the WORST - instead of having an amazing bishop waiting to wake up plus a great knight headed toward the center, they get a slight improvement on the same bishop plus a donkey on h6 that never does anything. I play the Dutch Leningrad all the time, and it bothered me at first that my bishop didn't come to life until later, but then I realized that being able to play Ne4 was WAY more important than influencing a couple of squares that I can't even use. 

That said - play the Nimzo Indian. It does not fianchetto a bishop, so Nf6 doesn't hurt the development of your dark squared bishop at all....in fact, that guy runs to the other end of the board and messes up their position really early!

why not put bishop at e7 1st ?

I will watch games of Dutch Leningrad

The queen's knight uses e7 to get to g6 by Nb8-c6-e7-g6, where it helps the kingside attack

That reminds me of the time some GM's was teaching some children.

He explained that in a certain position in the queens gambit white was aiming to push e2-e4. After he desperately tried to convince the children why this was such a good plan, one of the children suggested:

"If you really want to play e4 why don't you do it on move 1?"

He put his coat on and left.

Two reasons - first you have to prepare e5 with d6, and you want to castle before playing e5 (so the e pawn is stuck at home). Second, once you do play e5, your opponent often allows you an opportunity to open the position - and your bishop will come screaming to life. 

lol, just Bxh5 makes that move look prettttty stupid....yeah, don't play Nh5 there =P

teaching opening to low ratings players is bad idea. i hate trap movies, they dont teach chess, Kingcrusher teach cheap players be more cheap. i will ask youtube delete trap movies.

Don't think I'm getting through. Never mind. Good luck with your chess.